It is complicated, and the rhetoric on both sides of the coin politically doesn’t help. Illegal immigration has in fact hurt certain jobs, the claim that it takes ‘only low wage jobs’ like dishwashing and such (which is true), isn’t true in others. 25 years ago or more someone could make a living wage doing construction (and I know that for a fact, my uncle was a general contractor for many years), even laborers could make a fair wage. Look at most job sites today, and you will see a bunch of people laboring from Mexico and central and south america, and many of them are illegal immigrants taken in as day laborers, no worker comp costs, no insurance, guy gets hurt they dump him at an ER and leave, often don’t pay them, and pay them these days around 8 bucks an hour where I live…so it has hurt some jobs.
However, that isn’t the big one, it is a combination of things that have caused problems. One of the biggest is the middle class is often defined by the Median income, yet if you look at how much that is, that number has lost significant purchasing power compared to decades past, it hasn’t kept up with inflation (it is why they say real wages are fallen)…and what is really scary to me is that when they talk about the decline in the middle class, they are talking people not even making that median wage, 40k or so a year, roughly 20 an hour)…so what we even define as midlde income increasingly can’t provide what we used to call a middle income existence.
Those who support jobs going overseas point out that it has benefitted the middle class, because it has brought down prices…and yes, for certain things, they are correct, things like tv sets and appliances are much cheaper by any measure than they once were, clothing to a certain extent is, but it hasn’t translated elsewhere. They had these op eds in the NY Times commenting on Trump’s anti import stance, and it showed they live on planet zero, they made the argument that the lower cost had helped the working class and so forth, but were totally oblivious to something, and that is even with the cheaper prices people are struggling. While high end retailers are doing great business, constantly Nordstrom’s, Neiman Marcus, Coach, Tiffany’s and the like are doing good business, the low end retailers are not doing well, Wal Mart and Target, and even the dollar stores, are having troubles, and the prime cause isn’t because people are doing well and moving upscale, it is that even with cheap prices, lot of people can’t afford it. The other thing I hear is “we need to retrain people for jobs”, but that also leaves out something. Let’s say because manufacturing is booming in China, they are buying airplanes from Boeing, which should increase jobs. Leaving out something Trump is right (if china buys planes, they insist large parts of it be made in China), how do you retrain that mill worker from Georgia, and then get him to where the jobs are (I use him in the general, could be a man or woman). Economists live in a world of models and assumptions, but they are removing themselves from reality often in doing so.
Stockholders love outsourcing, stock analysts beam and upgrade stocks when companies announce they are moving jobs to China and India and Mexico, which makes the stockholders, especially the executives and big stockholders (who are all well off people) very happy, it is how CEO’s can make a hundred million in a year. Yet no one is bothering to think “hmm, we produce widgets, how will people afford them if they don’t have a job”. For the past 40 years, they have gotten away with it, first when with couples both people worked, then by all kinds of gimmicks, loose credit, low rates, home equity loans during the housing boom…but those have fallen aside, so now what do they do? The Chinese and Indians and Mexicans can’t buy the goods, so what do they do?
And yes, automation is increasingly taking over. Michael Crichton in “The Andromeda Strain” had medical scanners that could do as well as a human physician, but the main character jokes “The AMA won’t allow it”…that time is coming, for routine medical care there is no reason that we couldn’t have automated medicine. Likewise, robotics technology and nano technology are coming to a head where surgery may very well be done by robots in the not so far future. There already are automated financial advisors, Schwab and others have sophisticated investment “advisors” that is a program (and they don’t charge for it) that people can use, for example. In manufacturing, even China and India and Africa face a dilemma, because 3D printing technology is improving rapidly, the level of what it can do is huge, so cheap labor will fail because not only will 3D printing be cheaper, it also will introduce levels of quality not possible with traditional production.
It raises real questions, about what will happen going forward? The current mania, that the answer is education and retraining, will start to fail, we already have college graduates working at Starbucks and the like, and what happens when more skilled things are automated or go away?
Vonnegut predicted this in his book “Player Piano” more than 50 years ago, he predicted a society where there are the ‘engineers’ (managers really, in our new world order, computers are getting smart enough that they can design and build the next generation of things without much or any human intervention), and everyone else either is in the military or the ‘wreeks and wrecks’ (public works projects).
The ideas being pushed by the left, heavy tariffs, closing off trade, won’t solve the problem, and likely would hurt for a lot of reasons. In a utopian world, people would not have to work, that you would have a star trek kind of world where people could work at what they wished, find their passion, and not have to worry about money, I doubt that is going to happen, we have too many people still who crow about their success, who point to the person who ‘makes it’, without looking at the broader picture, or like for example the legal field, realizing that they can work hard, get into law school, get a degree, and find out there are no jobs for them (for example, legal research, which once was a ground floor for lawyers at law firms, has dried up, as has financial research, lot of it has been exported to places like India), and until a lot more people find themselves in trouble, instead of coming up with real solutions, you are going to see the left blaming big business and the politicians that support them, and the right wing saying there is no problem except people expect too much, want too much and don’t want to work, and we already are seeing some aspects of what happens, the anger behind the current campaign speaks to that. Even some conservative economists are looking at this, and saying it isn’t just the gap between the very well off and everyone else, it is about figuring out how to define the economy going down the line. I don’t think Marxism ever was the answer, but he raised many of the same questions, about how do we provide for people so they have some minimum level to survive? How do we do that, without taking away people’s dignity and pride?
Sorry this is long, but it is a complex topic.