The Top 25 Recruiter Picks

College Life
1

<p>[Top</a> 25 Colleges Ranked By Recruiters - WSJ.com](<a href=“http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704554104575435563989873060.html?mod=loomia&loomia_si=t0:a16:g2:r1:c0.157624:b37265586]Top”>http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704554104575435563989873060.html?mod=loomia&loomia_si=t0:a16:g2:r1:c0.157624:b37265586)</p>

<p>Very interesting.</p>

2

<p>Really, as much as I don’t like U of M… I’m not sure how I can trust a rating system that puts ASU over UMich.</p>

3

<p>That list is based entirely off of how many companies show up to recruit at a school. Of course 500 companies aren’t going to recruit at a school with a graduating class of 400…</p>

4

<p>Under how majors match up for MIT:</p>

<p>Engineering (8).</p>

<p>That says enough.</p>

5

<p>Glad to see that recruiters think MIT is overrated along with Private schools.</p>

6

<p>The fact that you go to Penn State explains why you feel the need to repeatedly post this…</p>

7

<p>UCLA: Finance (7)</p>

<p>the fact that UCLA does not have an undergraduate finance major makes me wonder if this includes business schools.</p>

<p>if so, the ranking makes slightly more sense. actually, where’s wharton? no it doesn’t.</p>

8

<p>

</p>

<p>Exactly. Arizona State is not even a Top 100 school, but it provides higher education for a whole region of the country along with UA with the largest student body in the nation.</p>

9

<p>I never understand these random rankings.</p>

<p>Is anyone actually going to choose Penn State over Harvard because recruiters rank it higher?</p>

<p>I’ll stick to the U.S. News ranking of national universities.</p>

10

<p>The point is that even if you do choose to go to a big school that isn’t as reputable as some other schools, you will have ample opportunities to find a job.</p>

11

<p>^^ha I think it’s funny that you put down these ratings and then “trust” US news ratings. Those are just as biased and skewed as most of the other ratings out there.</p>

12

<p>^ They really aren’t. Maybe there are some disagreements with certain parts of their formula and whatever, but on the whole they are a strong indicator and most people use them very successfully.</p>

13

<p>And… it came from the WSJ.</p>

<p>I’m disappointed, Rupert.</p>

14

<p>Sorry you didn’t make the list brah.</p>

<p>State Schools 1
Ivy Leage 0</p>

<p>“Recruiters say graduates of top public universities are often among the most prepared and well-rounded academically, and companies have found they fit well into their corporate cultures and over time have the best track record in their firms.”</p>