The True History Of Taiwan

<p>THE TRUE HISTORY OF TAIWAN</p>

<p>This is dedicated to all those who have suffered from the lies continuously perpetrated by the Chinese Government.</p>

<p>By Dr. Sim Kiantek
July 18, 2000
<a href=“http://www.taiwannation.com.tw%5B/url%5D”>www.taiwannation.com.tw</a></p>

<p>What China Said in Its White Paper 1993</p>

<pre><code> Taiwan was known as Yizhou (barbarian’s island) or Liuqiu (Okinawa) in antiquities. Many historical records and annals documented the development of Taiwan by the Chinese people in earlier periods. References to this effect were to be found in ancient Chinese book written more than 1,700 years ago and several others written in later times. Since early seventeenth century the Chinese people began to step up the development of Taiwan. The numbers topped one hundred thousand at the end of the century. By 1893 their population exceeded 2.54 million. That was a 25-fold increase in 200 years.

They brought in a more advanced mode of production and settled the whole length and breadth of Taiwan. Thanks to the determined efforts and hard toil of the pioneers, the development of the island as a whole greatly accelerated. This was the historical fact of how Taiwan, like other parts of China, came to be opened up and settled by the Chinese people of various nationalities. >From the very beginning the Taiwan society derived from the source of Chinese cultural tradition. This basic fact had not changed even during the half century of Japanese occupation. The history of Taiwan’s development is imbued with the blood, sweat, and ingenuity of the Chinese people.
</code></pre>

<p>What Is The Truth </p>

<li><p>Taiwanese are of Taiwan origin, not Chinese.
More than 10,000 years ago, the ancestors of modern Taiwanese were found in Taiwan which at that time was all mountain, so the Taiwanese ancestors are called mountain people. In the glacial epoch, some of the ancestors were driven south by the cold weather via seabed (it was dry at that time) to the Philippines, Malaysia and Indonesia.</p>

<p>About 7,000~8,000 years ago, the weather was warm again, the sea was full of water, with ocean currents flowing from South-East Asia to Japan via Taiwan. Some of the ancestors were drifted back to Taiwan, their homeland. Of course, many of them might carry the blood from South-East Asia due to hybrid. These ancestors were called Plain People because the majority of them lived in the plain areas after arriving in Taiwan.</p>

<p>In 1624, the Dutch invaded Taiwan, according to Dutch records, there were about 100,000 Taiwanese surrendered. In 1661, Koxinga took place of the Dutch, about 130,000~200,000 Taiwanese surrendered. Among them, there were 12,727 household units, about 40,000~60,000 Taiwanese were forced to be converted into the Han (the Chinese). These aboriginal were the first ones who were forced to give up their Taiwanese nationalities. In 1683, Ching, the Manchus, replaced Koxinga. In 1730, a report made by a general of Ching that surrendered Taiwanese were at least 600,000. </p>

<p>In 1756, the annual report came out with 660,147 men and women surrendered, they were aboriginal. In 1782 the population that surrendered was up to 912,900 and then 2.54 million in 1893. This 2.54 million was mentioned in the 1993 Chinese White Paper which treated them as Chinese. This was totally wrong, they were of Taiwanese origin. They grew as time went by. Their population was 6 million in 1943, and 21.5 million in 2000, among them, some are the offspring of Dutch or Chinese hybrid. </p>

<p>The pure Chinese came in 1949~1954 period, when Chiang Kai-shek fled to Taiwan with 0.94 million Chinese refugees, among them, only 0.21 million were female. Therefore, even if all female Chinese refugees married with male refugees, they could only create 0.42 million pure Chinese couples producing pure Chinese offspring, the rest 0.52 million had to look for Taiwanese to marry, thus Taiwanese blood occupied more than half the so-called Chinese. The population of Taiwan in 2000 is about 23 million, the pure Chinese are not more than 5%, about 95% of Taiwan’s population today carries aboriginal blood. Some have 100% aboriginal blood, some have 10%, mostly have more than 50%. </p>

<li>The land of Taiwan was developed by Taiwanese not by Chinese.According to Ching regulation, Chinese were not allowed to come to Taiwan freely. When they came to Taiwan, they were not permitted to trespass the reserved areas, because, Ching reserved almost all of Taiwan for the aboriginal. According to the government statistics, the total free area was only 71,150 hectares, which was less than 2 % of the area of Taiwan.</li>
</ol>

<p>Further, the Chinese were not able to resist the diseases in Taiwan, 9 out of 10 died, according to government records. Under such condition, Chinese dared not stay in the rural area. If they did not stay in the country side, who would cultivate the land? Only Taiwanese!
3. What were the Chinese in Taiwan during the Ching Era?
The majority Chinese in Taiwan were rascals, being single through out their lives, according to the government files. Most of them hide themselves in the urban area, lived on committing crimes. When they passed away, nobody dared to bury them. </p>

<p>The Chinese who came to Taiwan to “cultivate” actually were to deprive not to cultivate. They got the pieces of land by application. Through personal relations with the government officials or by bribe, they got the permit to cultivate the land in the appointed areas, usually hundreds or thousands hectares, a hectare is about 2.4 acres. It took at least 5 man/year to clear a hectare, and took one man to do the farming year around. If the Chinese got a thousand-hectare permit, they had to invite at least 1,000 tenants to rent, cultivate and do the farming. The profit for these Chinese guys after paying taxes was US$300~400 per hectare per year. As said before, the Chinese were not disease resisting, so most of the tenants were Taiwanese. Therefore, the true picture was, Taiwanese cultivated and Chinese got the profit which could be amounted to US$300,000~400,000 per year per person if the Chinese got the thousand-hectare permit.
4. The reason why Taiwanese are documented as Chinese.
Since 1624, Taiwan has being ruled by foreign regimes, such as, the Dutch, Koxinga, Ching, Japan, the Republic of China. All of the regimes were trying to convert Taiwanese into their nationals. Ching was successful, so the influence passed down to this day. When Ching occupied Taiwan in 1683, it adopted a policy called “To Convert The Wild Barbarians into The Civilized Barbarians” and then “To Convert The Civilized Barbarians into The Han (the Chinese).” The contents of the policy included discriminative practices such as higher taxes, longer free community services, unfair judicial judgements, for those resisting the conversion. No Taiwanese could live without being converted into Chinese. In 1683, the Ching still documented most Taiwanese as Wild Barbarians; in 1756, the status of the Taiwanese was changed to Civilized Barbarians; in 1777, all became Chinese. These historical records also evidenced the process of the compulsory conversion of Taiwanese into Chinese.</p>

<p>Since 1777, Taiwanese were documented as Chinese throughout the period of the Ching occupation. In 1895 when Japanese came, they tried to convert Taiwanese into Japanese but failed. In 1945, the Republic of China took advantage of the achievements of Ching policy, documented Taiwanese as Chinese with no resist. So even today, the poor Taiwanese would rather call themselves Chinese instead of aboriginal, since the term “aboriginal” implies wild or civilized barbarians.</p></li>
</ol>

<p>Continuation:</p>

<p>What China Said in Its One China White Paper 2000</p>

<pre><code> The Chinese White Paper on Cross Strait Relations (issued on February 21, 2000) stressed that Taiwan belonged to China on the following basis which are not true?
</code></pre>

<p>“I. The Basis for One China, de Facto and de Jure.
Taiwan is an inalienable part of China. All the facts and laws about Taiwan prove that Taiwan is an inalienable part of Chinese territory. </p>

<pre><code> In April 1895, through a war of aggression against China, Japan forced the Qing (Ching) government to sign the unequal Treaty of Shimonoseki, and forcibly occupied Taiwan. In July 1937, Japan launched an all-out war of aggression against China. In December 1941, the Chinese government issued the Proclamation of China’s Declaration of War Against Japan, announcing to the world that all treaties, agreements and contracts concerning Sino-Japanese relations, including the Treaty of Shimonoseki, had been abrogated, and that China would recover Taiwan. In December 1943, the Cairo Declaration was issued by the Chinese, U.S. and British governments, stipulating that Japan should return to China all the territories it had stolen from the Chinese, including Northeast China, Taiwan and the Penghu Archipelago. The Potsdam Proclamation signed by China, the United States and Britain in 1945 (later adhered to by the Soviet Union) stipulated that “The terms of the Cairo Declaration shall be carried out.” In August of that year, Japan declared surrender and promised in its instrument of surrender that it would faithfully fulfill the obligations laid down in the Potsdam Proclamation. On October 25, 1945, the Chinese government recovered Taiwan and the Penghu Archipelago, resuming the exercise of sovereignty over Taiwan.”
</code></pre>

<p>What Is The Truth </p>

<pre><code> The Legal Status of Formosa (Taiwan) Is Independent
</code></pre>

<p>Historically, Taiwan belongs to Taiwanese people as said above, all regimes appeared in the history of this island so far are predators. </p>

<pre><code> Taiwan is neither a part of Qing or the Republic of China nor a part of Dutch or Japan. Legally, Taiwan independence was determined in 1945 by the United Nations by adopting Charters 77 and 76, which was signed by China and most of the states in the world. The basic document China used to claim the title of Taiwan was the so-called Cairo Declaration, but it was not signed. Even if it were singed, the phrase “Formosa and the Pescadores shall be restored to the Republic of China” was completely against the Atlantic Charter signed by China itself, So, both in history and by law, China’s claims are void. That Taiwan is a part of China is nothing but an excuse for China to invade Taiwan. All the legal documents and events related are presented and summarized with comments below:

  1. The Atlantic Charter(1941.8.14)?
    </code></pre>

<p>a. First, the Charter announced that “ their countries seek no<br>
aggrandizement, territorial or other.” China’s annexation of
Formosa (Taiwan) is obviously a territorial aggrandizement.
b. Second, the Charter said that “they declare to see no territorial
changes that do not accord with the freely expressed wishes of the
people concerned.” Therefore, should Formosa be “restored”
to China as China claimed, the people of Formosa should be
consulted, so far there is no such consultation made.
c.Third, “they respect the right of all peoples to choose the form of
government under which they will live, and they wish to see
sovereign rights and self-government restored to those who have
been forcibly deprived of them.” The so-called “restoration” of
Formosa to China does not respect the people of Formosa in the
sovereign right and the right of choosing government.
This Charter was endorsed by China in the “Declaration by the
United Nations” below.</p>

<pre><code> 2. Declaration by the United Nations (1942.1.1) declare “The Government signatory ( U.S., U.K., Soviet Union, China ??etc. total 26 countries) hereto, having subscribed to a common program of purposes and principles embodied in the Joint Declaration of the President of the United States of America and the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland dated August 14, 1941, known as the Atlantic Charter.” China is one of the signatories of the Declaration, claiming the sovereign right of Formosa is a violation of the Charter per se.

  1. The Cairo Conference (1943.11.22-26)?
    </code></pre>

<p>Records kept by Chinese Government showed that President Roosevelt, Premier Churchill and Chiang Kai-shek of China agreed that Japan should be stripped of all the islands she had seized or occupied in the Pacific, including Formosa and the Pescadores. The disposal of these islands was not determined at that time. The phrase “Formosa and the Pescadores shall be restored to the Republic of China” on the so-called Cairo Declaration was a unilateral request by Chiang Kai-shek, Churchill rejected and substituted the phrase with “Formosa and the Pescadores should be renounced by Japan” but Chiang insisted not to change, therefore the Declaration was not signed. So, the common purpose of the Cairo Conference is to strip of Japanese colonies (such as Formosa and the Pescadores) and occupations.</p>

<pre><code> 4.The Crimea (Yalta) Conference (1945. 2.4-11):
</code></pre>

<p>The future of Taiwan was partially determined in this Conference. Under the caption “Territorial Trusteeship” of “World Organizations” of Protocol Proceedings it read “its being made clear that territorial trusteeship will only apply to??(b) territories detached from the enemy as a result of the present war.”
According to this agreement, Formosa, the Pescadores, and other Japanese colonies should be placed under trusteeship after World War Two, because the Cairo Conference decided to strip them off from Japan which constituted a “detach of the colonies “from Japan.</p>

<pre><code> 5. Charter of the United Nations Article 77 (1945.6.26) confirmed Crimea Agreement byregulating that “The trusteeship system shall apply to such territories as?b. territories which may be detatched from enemy states as a result of the Second World War.” This meant Taiwan should be put under trusteeship after the War.

6.Charter of the United Nations Article 76 (1945.6.26) stipulated “the basic objectivesof the trusteeship system ??shall be to promote political, economic, social, and educational advancement of the inhabitants of the trust territories, and their progressive development towards self-government and independence.” China is to blame, since it is one of the signatories of the Charter, now back up from their words pursuing imperialism.
</code></pre>

<p>However, in this article 76, it confirmed that Formosa was entitled to be an independent state, and established the legal status for Taiwan.</p>

<pre><code> 7.Postdam Proclamation (1945.7.26). The article 8 of it read “The terms of the Cairo Declaration shall be carried out and Japanese sovereignty shall be limited to the islands of Honshu, Hokkaido, Kyushu, Shikoku and such minor islands as we determine.”Since the terms of the Cairo Declaration was to strip all Japanese colonies such as Formosa and the Pescadores, and let them be detached from Japan, therefore, to carry out these terms equals to declare Formosa independence, according to Charters of the U.N. article 77 and 76 above.

8.Instrument of Surrender by Japan (1945.9.2)“accept the provisions set forth in the declaration issued by the heads of the Governments of the United States, China, and Great Britain on 26 July 1945, at Potsdam, and subsequently adhered to by the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, which four powers are hereafter referred to as the Allied Powers.” By accepting the Potsdam Proclamation, Japan actually announced Taiwan independence. Because the Proclamation requested Japan to give up Formosa, and according to articles 77 and 76 of Charters of the U.N., territories detached from the enemy (Japan) should be placed under trusteeship and then self-government and
</code></pre>

<p>independence.</p>

<pre><code> 9.San Francisco Peace Treaty with Japan (1951.9.8), article 2(b) read “Japan renounces all right, title and claim to Formosa and the Pescadores.”This is the legal confirmation of Formosa’s detach from Japan, and the Articles 76 & 77 of the Charters of the United Nations are applicable to Taiwan and the status of Taiwan should be independent, through Trusteeship and Self-government.

However, Chinese regime, the Republic of China, represented by Chiang Kai-shek took advantage of the General Order No.1 of the Ally Commander unlawfully occupied Taiwan while the Order only required him to accept the surrender of Japanese troops in Taiwan. The Republic of China occupied Taiwan by force since 1945 and started the notorious 1947 Massacre getting rid of Taiwanese elite so that nobody knew how to make petitions to the U.N. for independence, therefore the Taiwan independence process was interrupted till now.

All U.N. members have the obligation to move to blame China for the aggression and admit Taiwan, not the Republic of China, as a member of the United Nations. .
</code></pre>

<p>America should support Taiwan and all of its attempts to attain international recignition unconditionally.</p>

<p>“YAWN”
does anyone have time to read this? not me…</p>

<p>Also, i hope you realize that this is CC and not history class. CC is not too happy becuase you are using up valuable bandwidth/memory. THat text is long and will probably be removed by the moderator. SHould i tell them? If you want to voice your opinion you really should link to something, btw,
HISTORY IS WRITTEN BY MAN. the person who wrote it vocies his objects!!
I doubt few here care about these things…kinda boring…</p>

<p>Monzzei, stop being so ■■■■■■■■. I really doubt a text file is going to spike the bandwith of CC. And if you cared that much, maybe you should offer to create a system where you contribute money to CC so they can buy more bandwith. But, as a website owner I think this would only be like 36 kb or so. Nothing.</p>

<p>Okay…if nearly all the people of Taiwan have aboriginal blood, then how does one explain the racial clashes on Taiwan right now, which pits the Kuomintang against the native Taiwanese party that is currently in power? There are also two separate ideals on Taiwan that corresponds to the two races. The Kuomingtang previously in power still holds Nanjing as the capital of the ROC and claim the mainland of China as part of their territory, while the nativist party seems to want to abandon that claim and change the name of ROC altogether. And since many people still supported the Kuomintang prior to the other party came to power, it seems many people of Taiwan are of the prior ideal, therefore indicating that not all Taiwanese are of the nativist variety after all.</p>

<p>The KMT gave up the idea that they controlled China a few years ago; most of the people on Taiwan now are descendants from Chinese immigrants of the 16/17th centuries (IIRC). The KMT has used so many corrupt tactics to gain power in the past (like bribery, intimidation) that they have been able to hold power; now that their policies have become more and more moderate and away from any reunification issue, their power base has remained somewhat strong, but without the ideal of claiming mainland China.</p>

<p>If any of you are really interested in this, you can read my notes from my Eastern Civ class… We’ve been going over this very subject for almost a month now. Actually it is very interesting how the CCP took power from the KMT, and the fact the KMT did claim to be the rightful controlers of China up until I believe was the mid 90’s. I don’t think they have yet denounced themselves as the offical owners but the time does come when they got much more quite about it…</p>

<p>Where do you think Taiwanese ancestors came from? The God created them and sent them there? Obviously not! They rafted from mainland, as well as Japanese and Korean, they originated from China too!
And BTW, all human beings were originated from an African female, believe or not, this is undeniable.</p>

<p>another taiwain thread.</p>

<p>I for one, certainly do not value this person’s opinion. You can have a Ph.D go on about how African Americans are genetically inferior or communism beats capitalism, so what?</p>

<p>there is no point discussing in this. what’s ending the discussion will be J10-Su30-Su27-093-Kh-31-F16-■■■-1-Mirage2000, etc.</p>

<p>true that blackdream… true that</p>