this is how calculus was taught, "back in the day"

<p><a href=“http://www.archive.org/details/coursepuremath00hardrich[/url]”>A course of pure mathematics : Hardy, G. H. (Godfrey Harold), 1877-1947 : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive;

<p><a href=“http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Course_of_Pure_Mathematics[/url]”>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Course_of_Pure_Mathematics&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

<p>I don’t get it.</p>

<p>St.John’s College actually makes their students learn calculus directly from Newton’s work.</p>

<p>That looks pretty much like basic calculus to me. There isn’t much clutter though. It gets to the point.</p>

<p>Calculus is still taught in that way at Top schools, many Use tom Apostle’s books.</p>

<p>I think its a better way of learning compared to Larson and Stewart. </p>

<p>I always say if your book has a fancy colored cover it probably sucks.</p>

<p>Oh yeah, most of the times integration is taught before differentiation.</p>