<p>Yes or no, please explain why.</p>
<p>Personally, yes.</p>
<p>I hope to adopt and I don’t want to contribute to our saturating population.</p>
<p>■■■!</p>
<p>HElls no!</p>
<p>No thank you.</p>
<p>Insecurities abound.</p>
<p>ah, ya, NO. I like everything how it is right now, thank you very much.</p>
<p>that’s a really flawed procedure/thinking…</p>
<p>You know, you could buy condoms. Much less drastic.</p>
<p>lol, yea i know huh? Or some male birth control…but WOW…that’s just waaay extreme. I couldn’t even imagine anything going down there.</p>
<p>***. nooooooooooooooooooooooooo</p>
<p>not a chance…</p>
<p>Yes I would.</p>
<p>Disadvantages are small, and I don’t want to sacrifice a decade of the prime years of my life just for a baby when I can instead mentor someone if I have the desire to be parental.</p>
<p>granted only if there is an opportunity for The Thing (which I consider fairly unlikely)</p>
<p>besides, birth control pills have potentially worse complications. did you know that birth control pills don’t get totally eliminated through filtration and can prevent pregnancies in fish? Yes that happens. </p>
<p>I consider it de-entity-izing to force animals to have so many babies anyways.</p>
<p>first of all, I’m 99% sure your a female. so ofcourse you would because you wouldn’t need to, if you know what i mean.</p>
<p>and then, if you don’t want to have children… JUST DON’T DO IT!</p>
<p>there’s vasectomy and tubal litigation and that stuff. There’s no fundamental difference between the two.</p>
<p>to many people, “just don’t do it” is less preferable than getting vasectomy or tubal litigation (the pain of which is quite ephemeral, you know)</p>
<p>there is a difference. No-one gonna TOUCH MY STUFF!</p>
<p>It isn’t often I lol.</p>
<p>I said, fundamental difference</p>
<p>they’re both physical, not chemical</p>
<p>Of course I wouldn’t. </p>
<p>Although, I don’t want kids, anyway…</p>