<p>And time stamps too!!! Yay!! These gifts arrived this morning. The time stamp was screwed up briefly, but its fixed.</p>
<p>Getting fired is the least of Ross Harris’ problems. </p>
<p>Just updating the thread with another piece of data. His wife has hired an attorney as well. Now all communication will go through him. They’ll probably stop having the reporters show up at her condo too.</p>
<p>I cannot say how happy I am to have the timestamps back.</p>
<p>The photo from the savannahnow link is the first courtroom photo I’ve seen with him in blue instead of orange
wonder if HD had any input on that ;-)</p>
<p>I think that photo was from June 19. The lovely orange seems to have come later. Makes him easier to spot if he tries to bolt ;)</p>
<p>^ That was a pun… Home Depot… bolt… get it ?.. ok, groan… 8-} </p>
<p>Since they fired him if there are any recent IT grads out there they might want to think about putting in a resume.</p>
<p>My time stamp says yesterday…</p>
<p>
LOL-- maybe the new IT grads should apply for a job here too ;)</p>
<p>My time stamp says today. </p>
<p>My time stamp is correct.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, back at Home Depot . . . .</p>
<p>I see this, Harvestmoon:
:
</p>
<p>
Nope-- says yesterday</p>
<p>So if you guys are living a day ahead of the rest of us, tell us, what are the lottery numbers.</p>
<p>Behind the times again… sigh…</p>
<p>“Justin Ross Harris, 33, known to his friends as Ross, worked as a web developer for Home Depot. He earned $61,200 per year .”</p>
<p>Not bad considering he was spending his time sexting …</p>
<p>So if his wife was supposed to pick him up from child care, did she try to?</p>
<p>jym626, the time stamp must be computer specific because what you indicated is not what my time stamp says. </p>
<p>At least the post numbers are back!</p>
<p>harvestmoon1 - I don’t think it’s computer specific. I think it’s something else. for example your post says
yesterday at 10:16 pm however if I mouse over the yesterday it says July 10,2014 10:16PM.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Yes, she showed up at the day care. According to the testimony, when she was told the baby wasn’t there, she said something along the lines that her husband must have left the baby in the car. </p>
<p>(Some people feel that this statement indicates that she was aware of her husband’s intent… but I can see it being the first thing that comes to mind if the husband had a history of forgetfulness… plus there’s not really any other plausible explanation of where the kid could be, if she knew that her husband had gone to work during the day.)</p>