<p>Thanks for sharing!!! I wonder why they no longer have best undergrad architecture programs but instead they have “most innovative”. Could it be a shameless attempt of harvard, columbia and MIT to finally get on the list?</p>
<p>bneg -you’re probably right about the innovative list. I’m sure the Harvard et al alums were not happy that most of the real world “practitioners” didn’t think much of their schools.</p>
<p>taxguy - what was your overall impression of the Cincinnati DAAP School?</p>
<p>Daaaad, We REALLY were impressed with DAAP. When you combine the top quality reputation with the lower price for tuition compared to similar schools such as CMU, RISD, RIT etc, it was a deal! We also liked the the design of the building. This says a lot because my wife is a published interior designer, who also commented on the quality of the floor plan and the building design.</p>
<p>Glad to hear that. My d plans to visit DAAP and Miami of Ohio in February. Hopefully that will be the last of her visits, unless she decides to go check out CalPolySLO.</p>
<p>Not sure about the methodology, but I know that the ratings can change dramatically from year to year. Check out the Design Intelligence website for more details.</p>
I’ve notice this, too, and programs and reputations of programs don’t change that dramatically from year to year. My hunch is that either they have a quirky methodology or, more likely, a very small sample of respondents. Since these are “rankings,” and not “ratings,” they are especially susceptible to small changes in overall preferences. Anyway, this can be fun and a way for DI to earn a little money but of questionable meaning. If somebody had access to ratings for, say, the last 3 to 5 years, an average of them would be of more value.</p>