<p><a href=“WSJ in Higher Education | Trusted News & Real-World Insights”>WSJ in Higher Education | Trusted News & Real-World Insights;
<p>check this link out guys…i just wanted to know why arent schools like Davidson, Hamilton, Colgate, Carleton etc on the list whereas all these schools are highly reputed, selective and ranked in the top 20!</p>
<p>Here’s a thread on that:</p>
<p><a href=“http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/college-search-selection/372596-wsj-feeder-ranking-garbage.html?highlight=wsj+top+feeder+schools[/url]”>http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/college-search-selection/372596-wsj-feeder-ranking-garbage.html?highlight=wsj+top+feeder+schools</a></p>
<p>“why arent schools like Davidson, Hamilton, Colgate, Carleton etc on the list”</p>
<p>The bottom line is that small schools aren’t considered, even if they sent 100% of their grads to the targets surveyed. That’s why the list is worse than useless; it is deceiving in that it fools readers into thinking which schools are the best feeders.</p>