Total Country Debt vs. GDP

<p>A country’s “total debt” includes government debt as well as the debt of financial institutions, non-financial businesses and households. For the 10 developed economies (Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Spain, South Korea, Switzerland, UK and US), total debt increased from 200% of GDP in 1995 to more than 300% of GDP by 2008.</p>

<p>Total Debt in Selected Countries around the World, latest data available, as percent of GDP, </p>

<p>Russia: 71% (2008)
India: 129% (2008)
Brazil: 142% (2008)
China: 159% (2008)
Canada: 259% (2009)
Germany: 285% (2009)
United States*: 296% (2009)
Switzerland: 313% (2007)
Italy: 315% (2009)
France: 323% (2009)
South Korea: 333% (2009)
Spain: 366% (2009)
United Kingdom: 466% (2009)
Japan: 471% (2009)</p>

<p>I see massive printing of money in coming future. Unfortunately poor people will suffer more when inflation kicks in. Worldwide politicians are punting problems for future. Next downturn should be interesting…</p>

<p>By that definition, all money exchanged between people with the expectation that it will be paid back in the future is part of “total debt.” If I take $5,000 from my savings and loan it to you for your hot dog business we’ve increased the nation’s “total debt” but I fail to see how that’s a problem. (Similarly next year when you pay me back and loan me $10,000 for my coffee business.) It seems like countries with high velocity of commerce will necessarily have high “total debt.” A nation with no “total debt” would have a completely stagnant economy.</p>

<p>The whole thing just sounds like more meaningless FUD-spreading to me.</p>

<p>If you are start with the premise of total debt then the proper comparison is total assets not GDP. Otherwise you are comparing apples and oranges. And for the record, I prefer apples to oranges unless we are talking about juice.</p>

<p>The problem with the analysis is that for every debtor there is a creditor; one person’s debt is another person’s asset. “Total debt” simply ends up being a measure of commerce; how much money is moving around in the economy. The only thing that isn’t debt to somebody is the cash you stuff in your mattress or the gold bars you bury in your backyard. And those assets really aren’t doing anyone any good.</p>

<p>KLUGE:</p>

<p>Let us borrow another $5 trillion dollars and why stop there why not borrow $15-20 or even 50 Trillion dollar. If US does not stop printing money and borrow it by monetizing money, We should talk in ten -fifteen years time frame. At present it is not worth to argue, wait and see.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>“monetizing money” ?</p>

<p>monetize debt</p>

<p>This is going to happen more and more. Telling Truth; Called Unprofessional</p>

<p><a href=“http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/parent-cafe/1242767-total-country-debt-vs-gdp.html[/url]”>http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/parent-cafe/1242767-total-country-debt-vs-gdp.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

<p>Annaly: Cantor Analyst Gets Creative With His Criticism</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>I find what Michael Diana wrote refreshing; although, I have no idea how this relates to a country’s debt to GDP ratio.</p>

<p>Diana’s career as an analyst is likely to be very short.</p>