<p>Inside higher ed article focus is on a quite imaginative way for a college to call attention to high operational costs, tuition subsidies, and the importance of a strong alumni network when it comes to “giving back”- philanthropy.</p>
<p>Their purchasing dept must suck. Hopefully their alumni had great experiences in the ping pong room and will be active supporters after they graduate.</p>
<p>Not to quibble or haggle, but $530 is about average retail for, let’s say, a sturdy outdoor ping pong table - the price tag idea is gimmicky but, again, let’s face it, the college wants to drive home a point.</p>
<p>Dont want to quibble or haggle either, but if an institutional purchasing department is paying average retail prices then I’d say you need to replace some folks in that department.</p>
<p>And I understand the point. Its not necessarily a bad one, to try to inspire future donors…</p>
<p>It would be interesting though if they put a sticker on the faculty and admins showing their loaded salaries, in addition to tenure status.</p>
<p>College costs are spiraling at a much faster pace than the level of inflation for a reason don’t you think? And they aren’t all associated with just salaries, buildings and the cost of Ping Pong Tables.</p>
<p>All worthy points to discuss, and of course, items like ping pong tables are not essential to the college experience or at the heart of tuition hikes. Yet, from what I understand some one (parent, alum or whomever) either donated that sum of money to buy a ping pong table or gave the table to the college, hence the tag. Apparently, at Albright students also take part in a program called “Thanks-for-Giving” introduced in 2006 and write thank you cards to donors, who include alumni, parents, students, employees and friends.</p>
So I could donate a ping pong table I purchased wholesale, turn around and deduct it at the retail price? </p>
<p>I think this exercise is a good one in theory. But it does emphasize how the “true cost” of attending is really a number picked out of the air, inflated substantially, in the hope that families will stop griping about tuition.</p>
<p>AHH You know I have no attachment to Albright. </p>
<p>How much do you figure it costs to have a sign printed up saying “This Building cost $10.75 million and $200,000 in upkeep per year including gas,electricity, and maintenance services”. Oh yeah and the sign is as big as the building.</p>
<p>Pjp, I am not sure whether it matters or not if you have ties to Albright - I certainly do not - and I am all in favor of transparency when it comes to donations-philanthropy (money or in-kind) as well as for other college operating costs. Is this “philanthropy day” pure gimmick and nothing more?</p>
<p>Obviously, colleges have created a high demand for charitable giving - most of us like to think about this in terms of generosity - so to meet ever higher goals they have to reach out both farther and deeper to find and establish networks that will yield significant funds.</p>
<p>I couldn’t help but think of this thread and Albright’s novel efforts to stimulate alumni giving when I read " Survey: College giving up sharply – especially to wealthiest schools" - may be it doesn’t hold a candle to what the elites rake in but as this CNN article states “they have to be out there asking for it”. </p>