<p>Try this link: [url=<a href=“http://www.scribd.com/doc/27680350/Phyics1A-M2solutions]Phyics1A-M2solutions[/url”>http://www.scribd.com/doc/27680350/Phyics1A-M2solutions]Phyics1A-M2solutions[/url</a>]</p>
<p>Looks about right for a physics exam. There was easy, medium, and hard on that exam. The distribution should have a nice bell-shaped curve.</p>
<p>I planned to take these classes:</p>
<p>CS33
CS35L
Physics1B
Physics4AL</p>
<p>Would it be too difficult to add on Math33b?</p>
<p>can anyone tell me how hard or how much work EE 115C and EE M116L/CS M152A are?? Thanks!</p>
<p>I’m not a CS major, but if you have Whitten for 1B, then it will be pretty chill. Reading the textbook is enough to get you through the class and make sure you understand Gauss’s Law really well for the second midterm. 4AL is just time consuming doing error calculations. Expect spending 5+ hrs each week writing the reports. I’m taking 33B right now and I believe it’s the easiest class in the math 30 series (excluding 31A/B since I didn’t take them). It might depend on your professor though.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>I recommend sticking with your current schedule w/o Math33B.</p>
<p>What did you computer science majors do for your technical breadth and sci-tech electives?</p>
<p>
Do whatever you’re interested in.</p>
<p>^ did not answer the question. :rolleyes:</p>
<p>
I chose Technical Management as my TBA, and I would have chosen the Math sci-tech elective (if I was a CS major).</p>
<p>Happy?</p>
<p>yes</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>i forgot you are CS&E. big difference, right? :rolleyes:</p>
<p>what are sci-tech electives? is that just CS majors? i’m cse and i’ve never heard of it</p>
<p>just to be sure, the only electives we have are the 3 TB ones + 3 CS ones right?</p>
<p>also, madeinchina, how did you like the technical management TB classes? i’m starting out in them next quarter with eng 110. I didn’t really feel like doing hardcore math for another quarter and managment seems pretty interesting or at least a nice change of pace</p>
<p>
I think it’s a pretty big difference. It might just be a few classes, but I’ve gotten more out of the required CSE classes (EE115C, CS152B) than any other CS class I’ve taken so far.</p>
<p>
Yup.</p>
<p>
I’m extremely interested in technology management so I find the classes pretty beneficial. I highly suggest that you look into ALL the Tech management courses (outside of just the ENGR110 series) and see which ones you’re interested in. I’ve taken ENGR110, ENGR113 and ENGR180, and I’ve enjoyed all of them. I’m also enrolled in an Anderson course for next quarter, so there are other options outsides of the classes listed on the list. Be sure to ask your counselor if there are other options offered each quarter.</p>
<p>MIC, which Anderson one are you taking? Pao’s extended class?</p>
<p>@Deuces: Yeah, currently enrolled in MGMT241A.</p>
<p>I might have to drop it though because of a conflict with another elective I really want to take (CS144).</p>
<p>I was just wondering how hard it is to change from ChemE to EE after the 2 required quarters?</p>
<p>‘Someone in this forum said that UCLA’s aerospace engineering program is strong due to its ties with the aerospace industry. A couple decades ago this would have been absolutely correct. However, recently, UCLA has shifted its focus to IT and telecommunications and such fields related to EE and CS, while connections with the aerospace/defense industry has died off by quite a bit. Even companies have expressed this opinion. The fact is, internship opportunities will be scarce at best for an MAE student and you will be lucky to obtain one decent internship before you graduate, just like someone else said in a previous post.’</p>
<p>is this true for the MS program as well? How does Berkeley’s MAE MS program compare to UCLA’s in terms of the percentage of its graduates finding jobs after graduation?</p>
<p>I think many people know this already, but I will post it:</p>
<p>I feel that UCLA MAE undergrad does not prepare students well to work in the industry. Most of the hands-on skills and knowledge that these students acquire at UCLA are mainly through participating in student project groups and/or joining undergraduate research groups. Some learn skills through parents (who may be engineers). Some learn from previous internships. Very little outside of theory is actually taught in class.</p>
<p>If you are not good in hands-on, you can “redeem” yourself through academia. UCLA prepares students well in teaching the fundamental theories of the engineering field. The top academic students who master the theory and are most creative will go into research and academia, become PhD students, etc.</p>
<p>For UCLA students who are very knowledgeable in hands-on skills AND perform well in academic courses (high GPA) … these are the students who have a good chance of earning internships/full time positions in the defense industry.</p>
<p>However if you are not a top student in academics and are not very competent in hands-on skills, you will have a difficult time obtaining an internship and then a full time position right after graduation.</p>
<p>‘If you are not good in hands-on, you can “redeem” yourself through academia. UCLA prepares students well in teaching the fundamental theories of the engineering field. The top academic students who master the theory and are most creative will go into research and academia, become PhD students, etc.’</p>
<p>how does UCLA prepare its students getting a thesis-based MS in less ‘hands-on’ areas such as CFD, numerical heat transfer, etc, for employment?</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Interesting insight. Would you make a similar statement about any of the other hsseas majors?</p>