UCLA Ranked #25 in US News Rankings 2009

<p>From the “College Search and Selection” forum… :rolleyes:
California universities highlighted in bold:</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>Selectivity rankings… :rolleyes:</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>


**Biggest Risers:
School/08 Rank/09 Rank/Change**</p>

<p>89 Drexel University (PA) 108 89 +19
80 Clark University (MA) 91 80 +11
61 University of Minnesota—Twin Cities * 71 61 +10
102 Florida State University * 112 102 +10
83 University of Alabama * 91 83 +8
83 University of Tulsa (OK) 91 83 +8
**89 University of California—Riverside * 96 89 +7**
89 University of Vermont * 96 89 +7
61 Clemson University (SC) * 67 61 +6
61 Fordham University (NY) 67 61 +6
116 University of Kentucky * 122 116 +6
116 Catholic University of America (DC) 122 116 +6</p>

<p>**Biggest Fallers:**</p>

<p>113 Brigham Young University—Provo (UT) 79 113 -34
**96 University of California—Santa Cruz * 79 96 -17**
108 University of Tennessee * 96 108 -12
130 Samford University (AL) 118 130 -12
71 Worcester Polytechnic Institute (MA) 62 71 -9
83 Stevens Institute of Technology (NJ) 75 83 -8
102 University of Massachusetts—Amherst * 96 102 -6
102 Howard University (DC) 96 102 -6
102 Illinois Institute of Technology 96 102 -6
**102 University of the Pacific (CA) 96 102 -6**
130 Kansas State University * 124 130 -6

</p>

<p>There’s no rank 24…couldn’t they have given us that spot? :)</p>

<p>It’s kind of sad to see our fellow Banana Slugs take such a hard dip, btw</p>

<p>Rice, Georgetown, William & Mary, Tufts are all ranked way too low.</p>

<p>yeah true sucks that banana slugs took a hard dip, they are like our ■■■■■■■■ little brothers, we don’t expect them to be the best but still want them to do good :slight_smile: but highlanders went up way high :)</p>

<p>Man…I used to go to UCSC. I guess this makes me feel good :p</p>

<p>Too bad these rankings favor privates.</p>

<p>what criteria do they use for their rankings? cause we should be at least 100 places above USC</p>

<p>Top 20 are all private. What a joke.</p>

<p>“what criteria do they use for their rankings? cause we should be at least 100 places above USC”</p>

<p>amen to that one!</p>

<p>UCSD is on the rise and will eventually be ranked higher than USC and be ALMOST equivalent to UCLA within the next decade…according to recent polls.</p>

<p>Where did you see these rankings? US News & World hasn’t posted them yet. :confused:</p>

<p>I’ll check the College Search forum. :)</p>

<p>this is probably the princeton review list…</p>

<p>for mr muffin - </p>

<p>[Undergraduate</a> Ranking Criteria and Weights - US News and World Report](<a href=“http://www.usnews.com/articles/education/best-colleges/2008/08/21/undergraduate-ranking-criteria-and-weights.html]Undergraduate”>http://www.usnews.com/articles/education/best-colleges/2008/08/21/undergraduate-ranking-criteria-and-weights.html)</p>

<p>oo thanks!</p>

<p>lol they put alumni giving as one of the factors :rolleyes:.</p>

<p>yeah, the criteria favors privates for sure. that’s why we should all look at washington monthly where ucla’s #2! yayyy!!!</p>

<p>hurrah no change. a lot of the rankings are based on alumni giving, peer review and retention rate, all things that are up to the students</p>

<p>criteria favors privates and we’re STILL ahead of USC… even if it’s by a little</p>

<p>how is ucla 21st in selectivity if Cal is 14th? And how are we tied with U Chicago and Johns Hopkins? Those are way harder to get into ucla AND Cal. And Cal tied with Cornell in selectivity? Cmon we all know that ucla and cal admit a ton of idiots. hell i see them everyday on campus.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>To bring down the curve :rolleyes:</p>

<p>but yeah, I have to agree with you to a great extent.</p>