<p>I applied to 9 schools and am waiting to hear back about financial aid packages in the spring, but now I am beginning to look back on my list and wonder if it doesn’t quite fit me. My schools are: Wesleyan, Fairfield, Connecticut College, Skidmore, Marist, Ithaca, Cornell, Oberlin, and Rutgers.</p>
<p>At first I was very “ho-hum Rutgers”, I don’t want to go there because it’s huge and in-state and most people from my high school “bash” it. However, I am wondering at what point do I draw the line to say that, for my future (jobs, grad school) AND experience in college (interaction, caring professors), is it better to attend a small private liberal arts school or Rutgers.</p>
<p>At this point I am almost completely writing off Fairfield and Marist simply because they don’t seem THAT good and are virtually unknown outside the Northeast. My question is, am I correct in thinking it would “look better” (for lack of a better way to phrase this) to go to Rutgers (well known, national, large) than one of those two. </p>
<p>Line of thinking for others: Wesleyan may be too far-off-the-beaten-track for me and is also a reach, ConnCollege may fall into the “virtually unknown” category, Skidmore I am holding on to because of their horseback riding but will drop if the money does not shine through, Ithaca I am unsure about, and Oberlin is a tad far away and I am unsure as well.</p>
<p>Sorry for the long-winded explanation. Basically my question is whether it would be more “worth it” in terms of BOTH my education/experience/learning AND getting a job/grad school to attend a Fairfield/Marist/ConnCollege/Skidmore/Ithaca/Oberlin/Wesleyan vs. “just” going to Rutgers. (Cornell is the dream, if I get in there with money I will be on cloud 9).</p>
<p>Thank you for any input, opinions, warnings, whatever!</p>