Yes, different rankings show different things.
but again - did you read the methodology i showed - it’s not based on ANY outcome data. It’s a bunch of deans being surveyed. Perhaps they took care of their buddies.
Is that really what should be used to rank.
I showed you college raptor and CWRU was higher in BME than any…again, that’s another ranking.
Rankings are just that. And there’s tons of them. You are just choosing to focus on the best known. Look at business - people use Poets and Quants. People use Forbes or WSJ instead of US News - because they use real data to rank them - including career data that US News doesn’t.
How much does a school cost and how much do you earn? That’s what matters. After your first job, the where won’t matter - except to brag. Yep, people love to say Go Blue - even the ones that make less $$.
So my kid goes to UM - I’d have spent $260K more - and yet he has the same job at the same salary (at least starting) - got a good review and raise after year one. So what does rank have to do with it?
Rankings don’t pay your rent.
If you want to be in data science, dig deeper. A data scientist doesn’t just go by what US News or another survey say.
I have zero issue with UM - great school.
But if I’m paying, and I could get the same thing at half the price, well that’s what I’m doing.
I’m buying the Toyota instead of the Lexus. But as I said we are all different and if your folks are good with it, then great.
CWRU and UM really aren’t a fair comparison - the experience will be vastly different and I would focus on that - small classes vs. big, small campus vs. big, etc. Upfront cost if it’s a concern. Which is better for you?
These are the things to focus on.
Your outcomes in BME will not be different.
Focusing on that the Purdue Dean rated his UM counterpart high, did him a solid, is - well, taking a big chance.
My kid had 19 interviews and 5 offers by xmas. I’m guessing most UM or Purdue grads don’t have that…he worked for it - just like you will too.
Take care.