Undergrad grades vs. LSAT score?

[nspeds]

<p>

• And that is claim is based on…? I mean, I know we are all experts on LS admissions --but, besides that.

</p>

<p>Try reading around the forums and, yourself, making an assessment. I posted the Yale chart, did you read it?</p>

<p>

• Anybody can say “you have a shot a Yale.” Yet, the claim does not have any validity.

</p>

<p>1) Claims cannot be valid or invalid, they can be sound and unsound. That is the first step in your disabuse.
2) And no, the claim is significant. Though there may be many cases where one does have a shot, there are clear cases where one does not.</p>

<p>

-Can you proof that they have?

</p>

<p>It is ‘prove’.</p>

<p>

I was merely wondering. However, I think the answer is pretty clear. If not, please, prove me wrong.

</p>

<p>I do not need to prove you wrong, for your argument is fallacious. I need not bother explaining why it is so patently fallacious, I thought you were smart enough to at least figure it out on your own.</p>

<p>Apparently you cannot.</p>

<p>

• You are either really funny, or a really sad person. I really mean it.

</p>

<p><em>yawn</em></p>

<p>

By the way, did anybody ever teach you courtesy? That sort of statement is quite blunt and disrespectful.

</p>

<p>It matters not. I find your posts, overall, to be disrespectful. My reason is because of this statement:</p>

<p>

• And that is claim is based on…? I mean, I know we are all experts on LS admissions --but, besides that.

</p>

<p>The bottom-line is that we are not, but you act as such.</p>

<p>

• I never claimed to be an ostensibly well-read person on LS admissions data; you made such claim --thank you.

</p>

<p>Okay, so you are not well-read in the least. I am fine with that claim, as well.</p>

<p>

• I wish they offered maturity 101 in college. I really do.

</p>

<p>You have been making insults as well…</p>

<p>

You know, I predicted this sort of childish behavior from you part a few posts ago. From now on, I guess I just have to do what I said I would: ignore your stupidity.

</p>

<p>Proceed, little one. </p>

<p>I do not care whether you ignore, insult, or continue to post rubbish. I am here to help other posters. Akafizzle’s post was perfectly fine, and your criticism was misplaced. Any criticism I seem to render is subjected to ad hominem abuse, while the person who is abusing me is accusing me of maturity issues.</p>

<p>There as no formalized proof, your argument is fallacious, and I actually provided some evidence to substantiate my claim: the Yale Chart. You can make educated choices from that chart. Most posters do render accurate opinions about what one’s chances are; that is why there is a ‘What is your chances?’ forum: <a href=“http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/forumdisplay.php?f=5[/url]”>http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/forumdisplay.php?f=5&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

<p>In addition, how does one decide to apply to Yale, at any rate? The assess their chances, not so much as to whether they are a shoo-in, but as to whether it is even worth applying. This ostensibly simple concept is much to complex for you.</p>

<p>Law school, since it is so numbers-oriented, is even more predictable. While Yale itself does not admit solely from numbers, usings numbers as a predictor of ‘who has a shot’ is not irrational; if you analyze the chart above, you can determine whether it is, indeed, rational to apply. </p>

<p>I cannot believe this requires explanation, but I can expect no better from inferiors:</p>

<p>

You know, I predicted this sort of childish behavior from you part a few posts ago. From now on, I guess I just have to do what I said I would: ignore your stupidity.

</p>

<p>And this is the problem, your post is in itself a childish one. It is so patently obvious that not even Strunk and White will save you.</p>

<p>Please take that logic course.</p>