<p>Getting into UCLA or CAL has no relevance on whether you will get accepted to the other or not.</p>
<p>yea I found out today, but couldn’t find it yesterday.</p>
<p>Got in for Electrical E, 3.9ish gpa</p>
<p>just using it as a “barometer” of sorts</p>
<p>We have received your application for Fall Quarter 2007 and are still in the process of reviewing it. There are still applicants for whom decisions have not yet been finalized. Please continue to check back.</p>
<p>If your name and contact information listed above is incorrect, please notify us.</p>
<p>UCLA Undergraduate Admissions
and Relations with Schools </p>
<p>AHHHHHHHH</p>
<p>EDIT: Tensplyr : CONGRATZ!!!</p>
<p>OMG i don’t want to start a stampede here but i called UCLA to ask why i got rejected and the lady told me my evaluators might have overlooked a transferable math class i actually took and that she would re-evaluate me and give me a call as to a possible new decision!</p>
<p>3.8 complit igetc all prereqs done</p>
<p>xygirlx I hated seeing that yesterday because I spent the whole day waiting for the decision. And today not expecting to know the decision I logged on, and saw “Congratulations!!!” I was like holy ****. I wasn’t expecting it because I didn’t receive an email from UCLA to check the website. Whatever I am in !!!</p>
<p>Boscoboy - From what I saw last year at my CCC:</p>
<p>1) Those that got into cal, got into UCLA. </p>
<p>2) Those that got into UCLA, about half got into cal (which I think causes the if you get into one you dont get into other theory) </p>
<p>3) I never talked to someone who got into cal and not UCLA, but I would bet it happens. </p>
<p>UC’s at this level look for similar things, GPA, pre-reqs, IGETC… In my opinion for cal, the GPA is simply ratcheted up a few notches. </p>
<p>This is only my observation at my jc last year. There are soo many circumstances for admissions. I would think the UC’s are evaluating on similar criteria but that is just my opinion.</p>
<p>I Got in to UCLA for Anthropology all pre reqs igetc no tap and 3.25 gpa? lol i dont know what my gpa is. ok peace</p>
<p>mojo, wasn’t diamond unable to see financial aid, submitted it on time, yet still got in?</p>
<p>Also, from what I remember (I could be wrong, if I am I’m sorry), heavymetal was able to see FA, yet didn’t get in??</p>
<p>Are you sure he could. I mean, this is a guy who posted 20x that he had gotten in and various other things that caused me an ulcer.</p>
<p>Actually Diamond did not have all her FA info in on time. This is what she wrote: “nvm, I can’t see it because my parents just signed it last friday and they haven’t processed the EFC.” and HMG was never able to see it. I was able to see it but I have not received a decision yet.</p>
<p>peep2: I hope good news will come… :)</p>
<p>tensplyr: I guess I have to wait until I get somekind of decision…</p>
<p>congrats brown FX… if you look at last years UCLA acceptance thread it looks like a lot of people with low GPAs got in but this year, a ton of people with high GPAs got rejected~!</p>
<p>yeah, what sweetny said:</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>lax, why do you keep trying to disapprove the theory? its not going to work.</p>
<p>i still keep thinking its right:
</p>
<p>No haha, we hoaxed together and talked off of CC and he said he could see it (metal)…Sorry about diamond, that’s my mistake. </p>
<p>For the record, I was a hoaxer a few times myself. I didn’t have FA info up, and I just found out today I got in…yesterday I was “still in process”</p>
<p>Sorry mojo, didn’t see the part about “didn’t receive admission yet.” I thought it was a “see fa–> in, dont see it —> rejected” type thing</p>
<p>haha this is pretty funny…u guys are obsessive</p>
<p>Who Posted?
Total Posts: 7,057
User Name Posts
lostincode 446
mojojojo69 410
dhl3 314</p>
<p>Has anyone seen a TAP student not get accepted?</p>
<p>thanks! so it just goes to show you that adcoms do make mistakes and if you were rejected but can’t possibly understand why, then give them a call and get an answer.</p>