<p>Much of the land near USC is not exactly prime LA real estate, so reclaiming some of the ghetto wouldn’t be unreasonably expensive. And don’t forget they can always put Reggie Bush in charge of fund raising.</p>
<p>And Notre Dame will overtake Cornell by 2016.</p>
<p>And we all know how tight USC is on enforcing rules. </p>
<p>Hey, I kid the Trojans, but I’m glad to see the old world order shaken up a bit. Watching USC, ND, and Wake crash the party of the staid old timers is fun…like the Blues Brothers barging into that nice restaurant. I wish them well in overtaking Cornell, Berkeley, etc.</p>
<p>bluebayou - I am not sure that citing graduate school rankings, and somewhat old ones at that, done by the same magazine whose methodology is very questionable, is a very convincing argument. On the other hand, I cited hard stats for undergrads. And just so you know, I am not really bashing UC Davis and the others, I am simply pointing out that calling a school where at least 25% of the undergrads are below or barely average in reading comprehension a top 40 school is beyond suspect. I actually like UC Davis a lot and think they have made wonderful progress. But I am sorry, as far as I can tell it is pretty much an average to somewhat above average school. This ranking is complete nonsense.</p>
<p>Those areas are almost exclusively students anyway, and USC owns the university village. The academic campus will expand but the USC footprint will not.</p>
<p>And while UC and UCLA top USC in US News’ ranking of economic diversity among top schools, it’s kind of hard to refer to the #3 school with dollar signs. Tuition at USC is like a graduated tax: those who can afford it pay sticker price, while those with double-digit EFCs like myself go for next to nothing.</p>
<p>^ I personally have no problem with the condom reference. I love saving the world from HIV, STDs, and unwanted pregnancies. The world would be a much better place if everyone had access to condoms.</p>
<p>Would someone please post the top 25 universities and LACs sorted by exclusivity and if possible including 25-75 sat ranges and percent of class in top 10 percent of HS class. Thanks</p>
<p>And Cal Tech has, what, 1k undergrads, and another 1k grads?</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>UCLA by UC standards has a pretty small campus, 419 acres. The other Ucs are > 1,000 acres.</p>
<p>tsdad:</p>
<p>I agree with some of what you stated, and little of Pizzagirls last response; I dont know what orientation shes from wrt schools and etc, but there are a lot more fierce rivalries. </p>
<p>But what put USC probably over UCLA was the inclusion of hs counselors to the rankings and lowering the “peer” element. </p>
<p>I was just throwing out some thoughts why I thought USC was pretty limited in upward movement in the US News rankings (as are UCLA and Cal). You were free to respond and create conversation, which you did. (And I do know among a few other things the diff between “it’s” and “its.”)Thanks for responding…</p>
<p>Well, perhaps you do have a point. But, honeslty, I don’t see any difference in academic quality and academic prestige between say, Brown (91 points) and Dartmouth (89 points), for example.</p>