<p>I felt the answer to one of the questions regarding the teachers in the censorship dual passage, was that that they were renouncing their favorite books because there was something in the passage that directly led me to that answer.</p>
<p>Do you have even a faint idea of what it was? I feel like there was no way I would’ve missed something that could’ve implied “favorite” (and no, I do not believe “self-censoring” implies “favorite”)</p>
<p>and I loved that album</p>
<p>In the gossip CR, was there a question that dealt with how the internet gossip is different that wasn’t part of the complexity/affect larger publications.</p>
<p>I think the question was more or less to the effect of: What does the author say is the problem here : </p>
<p>and the author did directly mention how the larger orgs pickup on the small internet blogs. </p>
<p>But I might have also put complexity of debate. It really does depend on the question. someone should look it up.</p>
<p>post 341 and 337
National Enquirer never verified accuracy
US supreme court used to show distinction between oral and written gossip
Drudge question: complexity of gossip on the internet
Parentheses used to give additional info to previous statement</p>
<p>i’m pretty sure it was (complexity). the basically asked why Drudge was mentioned. And the author mentioned Drudge to point out how public figures don’t have to address internet bloggers/gossipers and can disregard them, yet, they cannot fully disregard them because actual news reports(ex. Washington Post) can create stories from this sort of gossip.</p>
<p>What’s the consensus on the noncontroversial books/renouncing their favorite books?</p>
<p>Do you mean the answer that said “students couldn’t enjoy their books” because of censoring?</p>
<p>Could not enjoy their favorite books</p>
<p>^ what question was that (detail) as in what was it asking for?</p>
<p>Syndekit, what did you get in January?</p>
<p>and the q was “what would the author of passage 1 point out with regards to teachers and librarians ‘self-censoring’”</p>
<p>If they renounced their favorite books wouldn’t that hurt his point?</p>
<p>I know, it’s weird that I remember that. That question was one of the hardest ones IMO</p>
<ol>
<li>Very disappointed.</li>
</ol>
<p>If that is the right question, then I put that “students could not enjoy their favorite books” because of censoring. Thus, this would limit the self expression of students.
What was the answer with “noncontroversial books;” I don’t remember that one?
Excellent memory btw.</p>
<p>Did the answer choice just say noncontroversial books or did it say more?</p>
<p>@141421356 </p>
<p>Are you suggesting that both answers were correct, but we are discussing two different questions?</p>
<p>Because that may be a possibility.</p>
<p>One answer was “complexity of debate”
Another answer was “gives certain media unearned credibility.”
These were both different questions.
If that’s what you’re asking…</p>
<p>those weren’t choices.
the choices were
“teachers would renounce their own favorite books”
or “they would choose non-controversial books”</p>
<p>given that his thesis was that censoring is the teachers’ effort to cause everyone to think just like them, I think non-controversial books fits best.</p>
<p>and based on the consolidated list, that is the consensus.</p>
<p>Yeah. Of course. Why is favorite books even being debated on?
I must have been referring to another question.</p>
<p>Additionally, noncontroversial books supports the moralistic answer previously debated on.</p>
<p>I was just nervous because people like meadow and grace who are at like -2 said they got favorite books. but watevz</p>
<p>Yeah, I’m nervous as well.
I found out that on math and reading I changed two right answers and got them wrong on each section.
That basically blew my chances at 2300+…</p>
<p>So far, besides the question everyone is arguing about, I’m at -0. Given this, I agree with “noncontroversial” because there was nothing about favorite books in the passage.</p>