I am a high school senior who has been accepted for the B.Arch programs at USC, Syracuse, Pratt Institute, and Carnegie Mellon. Even though I have looked extensively into the programs, I am struggling to make a decision. From what I have heard, all of these institutions have great architecture programs, so making the right decision has been tough for me. I was hoping to get some insight as to which choice would be better for me not only during college, but also after.
Here are some of my preferences regarding school: I probably won’t be participating as much in the party scene or greek life, but I still want to be in a social environment. I don’t really care much about the weather. I do want to travel abroad and obtain job/ internship opportunities in and out of school. I don’t want too artsy or too technical of a program, somewhere in the middle.
Now I’ll give more details for why I am struggling to make a decision:
(I have no info for what my financial aid might be at the moment)
USC:
Pros: big campus, located in L.A., large alumni network, visited campus
Cons: no scholarships, high tuition, distractions, not as high level of an architecture program (?)
Syracuse:
Pros: $10,000/ year scholarship, highly accredited architecture program, quieter environment
Cons: very cold, not much in the surrounding area, less prestigious, smaller
Carnegie Mellon:
Pros: near city, well rounded school
Cons: QOL not the best, more technical focused program, not the best location
Pratt Institute:
Pros: in Brooklyn, $20,000/ year scholarship, highly accredited
Cons: small campus, lower QOL, less prestigious, more artsy
Any help would be greatly appreciated, and please also correct me if I am wrong in my pro/ con lists. I would really like some input or opinions, especially if you are currently in a B.Arch, or have graduated. Thank you.