<p>Being accepted into all 3 I think these are my most realistic choices. What does everyone think?</p>
<p>USC: Good size, large sports, awesome spirit, nice small campus (probably the best of the 3), alumni connections, crappy area, good weather, reputation on the rise, yet not Berkeley, LA, or Stanford quite yet, seems fun, best women</p>
<p>UCLA: Beauitful beautiful school, best weather, nice surronding area, very big size, big but beautiful campus, large sports (not as succesful as SC and most facilities are off campus, Rose Bowl), great reputation, seems fun, pretty good women</p>
<p>UC Berkeley: Best reputation of them all, very big size, beautiful campus (better organized than LA but not better organized than SC), crappy yet interesting area, big time sports getting better every year with all facilities on campus, close to SF (good or bad thing?), seems like it would be least fun of these 3, most competitive for sure, student body may be odd, I heard they have the second worst women behind Stanford</p>
<p>What do you guys think? I just gave a summary of the three schools from my knowledge and what I have heard. I’m looking to major in a science/nueroscience and maybe a minor in psychology/philosophy and probably go into medicine. I’m looking for an amazing student body where people aren’t completely into the grade and filling their resumes but look outward instead of inward and think about the bigger picture. An intellectual student body with goals set is an ideal environment (good women wouldn’t hurt either).</p>
<p>I was accepted into all 3 with an open major and accepted into the Honors College at UCLA (not quite sure what this is yet). I also received the Presidential scholarship from USC which pays for half-tuition. But I’m not sure if I could give up UCLA and Berkeley for SC which might be at the same level academically yet.</p>
<p>What do you all others think who are making this same decision?</p>
<p>Emory is also an out-of-state option…</p>