<p>As far as Cho’s parents, I read an article that it is a FALSE rumor that they attempted suicide, but that they merely are being hospitalized in shock.</p>
<p>While there is no way to prevent such atrocities as the one that occurred at VT two days ago, there are ways to make it more difficult to kill a lot of people at once with a handgun. To those who keep mentioning that there is a right to bear arms to protect oneself, nobody really needs these types of weopens being used in these violent mass killings, NOR this amount of ammunition at their disposal. Yes, people will try to obtain it illegally but we don’t have to enable them by making it easy to obtain legally. These weopens are designed to kill PEOPLE. Nobody needs these, in my opinion. Also, what justification is there to sell someone this quantity of ammunition? Even those who say it is their right to “protect” themselves with a gun (I’m not into this myself), you don’t need all these rounds of ammunition in case you come in contact with a killer in self defense. So, I don’t think it should be this easy to obtain these types of weopens (and I do not mean hunting rifles) or this quantity of ammunition by anyone, let alone anyone who has come in any contact in the past as this young man has with mental health facilities or police (even if not arrested), or with the ability to accrue this amount of ammunition. </p>
<p>Since it is hard to get rid of all guns that are already out there, I think we need some security measures that won’t prevent this from happening but will make it harder to carry out. For instance, I think all school buildings should have metal detectors at the entrance along with security personnel. We have this for airplanes or government buildings, and we need to have schools which should be safe havens, have this sort of security. Because my child attends a university in Manhattan, security is tighter and IDs are needed at EACH building’s entrance (not just dorms) and there are security personel at the entrance to each building. I think metal detectors also are needed. It would be harder to enter a building with a gun if this was in place. </p>
<p>Of course there are many other factors being discussed. I don’t see blame in this situation, or at least not until more information is available. It is very easy to look at things in hindsight, as well as when all the pieces of the puzzle are put together. I do think students reported this young man in the past, as did professors. Perhaps any one single incident didn’t take it to the level of being expelled. But I think people did act. </p>
<p>I’m not sure a “lockdown” would have worked because this young man could have been in any of the school buildings at the time of a lockdown and shot everyone up in that building who was staying put as directed. </p>
<p>I am sure there will be lessons to be learned and new measures put in place as far as notification, security, mental health issues on campus, gun and ammunition availability, and so forth, as there should be. I am not too keen on blame here. It is a tragedy that really could not be foreseen in the way it happened. If measures can be put in place to make it harder to carry out such crimes, it will help, but I doubt these events will be eliminated all together, unfortunately.</p>
<p>In the meantime, the stories and fallout, as well as family/friends’ grief from this event, are far reaching and gut wrenching.</p>