<p>I have suspicious minds about this case. It is my assumption, but listen. It is worth to do so.</p>
<p>Today, the videos have been released through the news. Yet, I feel something is missing right now, though the police will not find any substantial evidence. </p>
<p>I “think” that there is second man, who disguises as a man of innocence. He or she will not be found. Think about the video and his action in the second shooting place. He wore a mask. Why…He certainly did not show any remorse toward people around him, and this doesn’t explain his will. If his action was cold blood, he did not have to disguise his face. Rather, he wanted to show off. His will to crucify as an embittered man was not revealed when he shoot all people around him.</p>
<p>Wearing mask was doubtful somehow. But this isn’t over yet. You know what cho’s COD is? his shot wound is in the back of his head. of course, somehow slanted in position of the back of his skull. He showed that he could choose his life whenver he wanted. Yet, the wound was not in his mouth or usual place as those of most suicide cases. Think about it. I thought about the position somehow, and the would-be innocent man inside the hall knew his work was finished and killed Cho with one shot. This is only my assumption, to repeat.</p>
<p>Cho said " I did it because of you." what does YOU represent? YOU means society as many professionals said. Yet, this could be another accomplice. He was angry about being compelled to kill people, but wanted to do so in his inner mind, so that he did not disagree with the accomplice. YOU has a lot of complicated meanings. YOU obviously indicates the insanity of his mind.</p>
<p>His shooting skills is too perfect to assume that he shoot for the first time when in the massacre. I don’t think that Cho could have liked the small guns. Think about the Columbine one. They chose the bigger one to kill many people. Two small guns and no shot guns at all are very weird choice for a novice killer. But, the result is unfortunately too large in extent.
I am really sorry for the loss of innocent, brilliant people in VT</p>
<p>I am no professional. But consider my assumption. This is no just ordinary assumption. It indicates that a third person “might” have been involved in this scenario. And if he or she really exists, he might be wandering around. This is my personal veiw, and I consider this posting heavily. </p>
<p>Gunshot in Cho’s back of the skull, and wearing a mask when shooting, and his skill to rob innocent lives of people are genuinely so perfect, as if he were working with another accomplice.</p>