WebSense (webcensor) at Public Schools

<p>My entire school district recently banned Google Image and Yahoo Image because child porn was found on a middle school teacher’s computer (he was set up by his students). Apparently even the high schools had to be banned because the computer network cannot be adjusted for only the elementary and middle schools. Personally, I don’t believe that to be an effective measure to “protect” young kids. The board of ed might reconsider its decision if many complaints arise as a result. Right now, I only have the following arguments:</p>

<li>Existing filtering of sites in general is not an almighty shield; many sites considered inappropriate can still be accessed. Many kids still can and often do play “mini golf” or watch videos of basketball game. On the other hand, many educational sites are banned because they contain a phrase such as “humor”.</li>
<li>Schools are primarily made to educate students… Google image is an easy and powerful tool for academic research. They shouldn’t prohibit access to a tool that is almost indispensable to high school students </li>
</ol>

<p>Qualify/dispute?</p>

<p>The Web is such a beautiful place. Full of promise and a fountain overflowing with learning opportunities for all of us, young and old.</p>

<p>But only the most naive would deny the dark underbelly that exists in the “wild West” frontier of the Internet. Those of us who encourage our children to be independent must now take a very close second look at their Internet independence and act accordingly.</p>

<p>Like many others, I abhor the whispers and innuendos of government influence (as in taxing, as in controlling) of our beloved cyberworld. If we want to remain free of Big Brother, however, some vigilante justice may have to have to come into play to deal with the predatory influences that proliferate on the Internet.</p>

<p>Take Myspace.com, for example. It seems innocuous enough; our children talk to their close friends and develop a community through those connections. But look a little closer and you will see that Myspace.com is a portal to influences to which most parents would NEVER willingly give their children access. If your teen-aged child has a computer behind a closed door without the most invasive of parental controls, you have no idea what he or she may be exposed to. How many parents have actually explored Myspace and experienced the gauntlet of pop-ups? I have, and I quickly realized that what is already inside the home may be more dangerous than whatever lurks outside.</p>

<p>We spend untold amounts of money to protect our children behind gates, to keep them actively engaged in activities that benefit their minds, bodies and souls, and then, at the end of the day, we turn them over to the Internet, where much or most of our decade-long efforts can be overturned with a simple click, click, click. </p>

<p>And you can never even hope to have the satisfaction of seeing the face behind the curtain, the person whose tempting pop-ups lay in wait to steal your childrens’ innocence, or their integrity. He or she or they are anonymous; they live behind the shadow curtain of the Internet.</p>

<p>“Mini golf” or watching basketball game videos are by far the most benign temptations that await children on the Internet. The fact that this teacher’s students could so easily “set him up” with child porn images speaks for itself.</p>

<p>We’ve been locking all the doors to keep our children safe, but I’m beginning to think we should have locked the computers instead. I suppose the ACLU would disagree with me. Our Congressmen and Senators appear to be oblivious to the threat. The religious community is aware and clamors for action, but their perceived influence is much higher than their actual influence. </p>

<p>So who’s on first? As usual, parents are left alone to fight the most important of battles. Bill Gates himself advocates parental controls on the Internet. His oldest is ten, however. I wish him luck hanging over the shoulder of his sixteen-year-old. That’s what I do, and I can tell you, I’m not winning any popularity points at the moment…</p>

<p>I go to a private school that uses Websense, so although the censorship/ACLU-ish issues don’t apply, it still is really, really annoying. The Department of Health and Human Services’ website was blocked under “lifestyles” or something similar when I was trying to get info for an inclass assignment. Random websites like ask Yahoo! are blocked, which doesn’t make a whole lot of sense, although it’s not a strictly academic website. One time, the whole system was being weird and blocking almost every website, even the school’s own homepage. Honestly, what it blocks and what it lets through is completely illogical. And, porn-type images still manage to get through (while it blocks a Google image of Daisy Duck in a swimsuit!).</p>

<p>I, for one, believe that the opportunities of the Internet outweigh its risks.</p>

<p>With that being said, you’re not going to be able to keep a motivated teen with internet access from accessing pornography. Trust me. As for whether or not that’s a bad thing in whole is yet to be seen (I’m not so sure that porn is the evil that we so often make it out to be).</p>

<p>Our district uses Bess. Some things that are blocked are bizarre, just because one word in the title is blocked. Don’t try to do a paper on Nazis. You won’t get to any website that has that in the title. And the kids seem to figure out ways to get around it anyway. Of course, the teachers don’t know how, but the kids do. So we can’t access sites, but the kids can. So whenever we are in a computer lab, we have to keep walking around checking the screens to make sure the kids aren’t on a different site. Not so easy, with the configuration we have. As I am on one side, the other is blocked by the computers in the middle, so by the time I can get to the other side, the kids can switch sites. Our computers are monitored and the kids have assigned computers in the lab, so we have caught kids and they have been punished for getting on unauthorized sites.</p>