<p>Is it cosmopolitan to allow the free flow of ideas, even if you disagree with them, or is it cosmopolitan to restrict people you disagree with from even speaking?</p>
<p>Schmaltz - Can you give an example, based on your personal experience? It might clarify what you’re getting at.</p>
<p>Wesleyan (better name) > USC (fun, opportunites) > NYU (no real campus, I have not been impressed with the students I have met from there)</p>
<p>BC depends on your priorities</p>
<p>Here’s an example, JW, although there is really no reason to talk to you…as is common on your side of the fence, you don’t have the guts to engage in a fair fight, and either shout down the opposition, ad hominem him into boredom, or act like you don’t understand the question.</p>
<p>[When</a> anti hate groups attack: Ann Coulter speech shouted down by dry-humpers of the First-Amendment : The Powers That Be](<a href=“http://dougpowers.com/2005/12/08/when-anti-hate-groups-attack-ann-coulter-speech-shouted-down-by-dry-humpers-of-the-first-amendment/]When”>http://dougpowers.com/2005/12/08/when-anti-hate-groups-attack-ann-coulter-speech-shouted-down-by-dry-humpers-of-the-first-amendment/)</p>
<p>^^Well, I’m still scratching my head. I offered you a chance to stray back on topic and you didn’t. My apologies to the OP. :p</p>
<p>Thanks for proving my point once again. Keep scratching.</p>