<p>Gee, here’shoping, I am learning about the other mindset. </p>
<p>I understand why people have been objecting to some of the broad generalizations made on this thread-- particularly NSMs allegations about EC participation. I also understand wanting to make sure it is correctly pointed out that top kids exist at all sorts of less-elite schools and that they go on to do very well, or that many top kids are pretty much “school proof” and dont <em>need</em> an elite school. It is also good to mention the importance of judging individuals on merits. All this is true. BTW-- I reviewed all my posts on this thread and defy anyone to point out one where these concurrent and relevant views were not respected and recognized by me.</p>
<p>But right now I see this mindset: people who, in their righteous zeal to defend the top kids at mid-tiers, are more than willing to under-estimate the entire population of kids who attend elite schools as a counterweight. Those who invoke personal experiences in dissing Ivy slackers, but won’t respect personal experience as a reasonable basis for answering the thread’s title question.</p>
<p>I also see a real bitterness and resentment that someone who posts here would enjoy a little bit of boost JUST from the name of the college they attended-- just because that college had a great reputation for admitting and graduating bright kids. </p>
<p>Yet, it’s okay for curmudgeon to say that or think it-- so long as he or his D didn’t DO it. Hmmm.</p>
<p>Okay: MY question-- where do you guys draw the line? </p>
<p>Why then pay for a public honors college, when a smart kid can do just as well at a lower tier public for less? Why then pay for the low tier public when a kid can do just as well at a CC? (Think of the diversity bonanza there!) But wait, why go to the CC when you can go to the University of Phoenix online? Why bother with an online degree when you can just go to the library and read a bunch of books and learn? Why bother going to the library when you can just zoom around town with insightful, erudite cabbies? My goodness, none of it will even <em>matter</em> when you get out there in the working world and just Get Cracking!</p>
<p>And, Gee, why even HAVE a degree or resume when you apply for a job-- you can be brilliant and effective even if you have no education because you’re JUST AS SMART. If they want that piece of paper they are just classifying you by an elitist system that is unfair to the brilliant, edgy, contemplative kid who didn’t leave his house for 25 years!</p>
<p>On this thread I see a mindset that does not want to accept the reality that exceptions often prove rules. I see a mindset that has to denigrate people from elites because a minority of those kids are rude, dumb, or unmotivated-- yet one that freaks out about a resume-screening-level ding on a lower tier State school because some a minority of those kids are really F-ing smart. </p>
<p>I see a mindset of fingers in ears going lalalalalala. </p>
<p>I am wondering why anyone who doesn’t want to know about, or share, ideas about advantages of top schools even opened this thread? I am wondering why anyone who isn’t all about their kid going to the <strong>best possible school, that fits them, and can be afforded</strong> is even on CC?</p>