<p>There is very little focus on science or math. There is absolutely no focus on athletics or sports. ECs are for … Just not the picture I get from Indian kids, living in India, who post on CC. They are par with US kids academically, sometimes better. Their ECs may be badminton, cricket, soccer instead of marching band and Key Club, but not exclusively singing and painting or more tradtional cultural activities. Not exclusively. The only diff I see is that they don’t have the string of hs-level “leadership” opps- vp of this or that. These kids come to US colleges prepared, academically and socially. And, many do have community service, as part of school or another group- or because they know it figures in college apps.</p>
<p>I can see why IP says, once in college, you can’t follow the same pre-college hustle of activities, so choose ones you can do well at- or be very, very good at- or that are, in some way, relevant to you. That’s simply his/her way of saying something many American parents believe. We try to expose our kids to many activities, over time, and then expect them to focus on a lesser number, according to their interests and strengths. Yes, we do. We don’t expect them to be in 4-5 college clubs, including some with competitions (debate, sci bowl, etc) a sport or two, plus vol work or comm service. We hope they will be engaged- and try some new things- but use the college years to identify what matters to them. If they have a particular talent- music, sports, whatever- we do hope they will keep up with that and progress in some way. </p>
<p>I don’t see OP/IP calling us barbarians. I see phrasing that keeps up a bickering. At various points, I thought it was willful, yes, and at other points, just a difference in how we use English.</p>