<p>I keep on hearing that one should not include CAD in architecture portfolios. By CAD, I assume you are referring to computer-aided design. However, what do you guys typically include under this category of “computer-aided design”? Surely one or two digital paintings (e.g. done with a tablet) should be fine, as they are basically the same as regular paintings minus drying paint and plus infinite supplies. I assume that by CAD, architects generally refer to autocad ([AutoCAD</a> 2010 - Features, How to Buy, Tutorials, Support](<a href=“Autodesk | 3D Design, Engineering & Construction Software”>Autodesk | 3D Design, Engineering & Construction Software)) and not necessarily just any digital art?</p>
<p>I’ve heard a lot of mixed opinions about submitting digital works. But I’m sure if it demonstrates creativity and skill, there isn’t much of a problem.
As you assumed, CAD means work made in AutoCAD. Some schools completely refuse to accept any sort of digital work, but that’s fairly rare. But in those cases, they specifically refer to those examples as “digital works” not “CAD works.”</p>
<p>What I’ve heard is that submitting digital art is fine, so long as it’s brilliantly executed (as should all the other pieces in your portfolio be). One should, however, avoid including AutoCAD/Sketchup/Rhino works unless they are beyond amazing.</p>