<p>I’ve looked for this on the Obama site, but can’t find it.
Looking for ammo as I see Clinton now is capitalizing on an Obama stand-in who couldn’t list anything Obama had accomplished.</p>
<p>Yeah, good old Kirk Watson couldn’t list any legislation that Obama had sponsored. Deer in the headlights. He couldn’t even come up with an answer like “He wanted to do X but was thwarted by the Republicans…”</p>
<p>Empty suit with charm. They made movies about guys like this.</p>
<p>I think that mini already did a good job at listing Hillary’s “accomplishments” on another thread.</p>
<p>I think it started out with. - 1. Voted for War in Iraq, etc. ;)</p>
<p>Might have mentioned failed Health Care Program too. I think she named a museum after someone though. I’m not sure.</p>
<p>From wikipedia:</p>
<p>From the 109 Congress:</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>From the 110 Congress;</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>I’m not sure that I expect him to be able to sponsor and have passed new laws as a new Senator in a 100-member Senate. As President he will have a lot more influence in getting people to work together. I find him to be a very hard worker and, while confident enough to pursue the highest office, not so egotistical as to be a grandstander. He actively shied away from all media attention in his first year in the US Senate, with the sole purpose of learning from his colleagues and listening to his constituents. How refreshing.</p>
<p>He actually sponsored and passed much more substantive legislation in two years than Hillary did in eight. But what he didn’t do was not only support the initial Iraq invasion (without reading the intelligence report), but support the hostile, aggressive occupation with speeches delivered from the Pork Zone in 2005. And he didn’t raise almost $200 million for his campaigns.</p>
<p>Measuring the legislative prowess of a Senator in three years is silly, especially when considering the amazing record of the past frontrunners like John Kerry and the lady with 35 years of solid experience and dedication to serve her country.</p>
<p>He actually has quite a good record of quietly working on important, but not newsworthy, legislation, often with Republican senators. A few examples:</p>
<ul>
<li><p>with Lugar, legislation to secure Russian “loose nukes” as well as conventional weapons</p>
<ul>
<li>avian-flu related bills, including pandemic preparedness</li>
<li>regulation/oversight of genetic testing</li>
<li>with Clinton, program for disclosure of medical errors (aimed at reducing malpractice claims)</li>
<li>chemical plant security</li>
<li>lead paint</li>
<li>several bills to help victims of Katrina</li>
<li>public database of federal spending and contracts (note theme of gov’t transparency)</li>
<li>raising CAFE standards</li>
<li>veterans’ health care</li>
<li>lobbying reform bill</li>
<li>bill to make certain forms of voter intimidation illegal</li>
</ul></li>
</ul>
<p>when he took office. I am glad that this election cycle we appear to be nominating folks that have at least some national experience, rather than the practice of bringing in govenors with no national experience of late (Carter, Reagan, Clinton, Bush II). We are in Texas, which is a state where the governor really wields little power. Bush appeared to do as well in office as he did, because of Bob Bullock, the Democrat who was LT Governor when Bush assumed office his first term. He actually had more power, but used it to make Bush look good. Kind of groomed him for the job because he thought the guy could work both sides of the aisle.</p>
<p>Yes, I’d heard that in TX the governor actually has little power. The governors do well in presidential elections because they have executive experience and, also, no one can say, “He voted to raise taxes 558 times!”</p>
<p>If you’d like information on any legislator’s work, a convenient source is GovTrack.us. Here is Obama’s page:</p>
<p>[GovTrack:</a> Barack Obama](<a href=“http://www.govtrack.us/congress/person.xpd?tab=roles&id=400629]GovTrack:”>http://www.govtrack.us/congress/person.xpd?tab=roles&id=400629)</p>
<p>You can read there that of the 129 bills that Obama has sponsored since entering the Senate in Jan, 2005, only one has become law. Clinton has sponsored 354 bills since Jan, 2001, and two have become law. McCain has sponsored 403 bills since Jan, 1997, and twelve have become law.</p>
<p>seems when you have to take something his wife said, then cut out a very relavent word, then talk about it for days</p>
<p>as for law, the congress didn’t do a whole lot with bush as prez…the republicans wouldn’t allow anything to get done</p>
<p>“BAGHDAD (AP) 2/19/05 — As 55 people died in Iraq on Saturday, the holiest day on the Shiite Muslim religious calendar, Sen. Hillary Clinton said that much of Iraq was “functioning quite well” and that the rash of suicide attacks was a sign that the insurgency was failing.”</p>
<p>(from the Pork Zone with John (“My friends…100-Year-War”) McCain)</p>
<p>I just read a very insightful comparative analysis of Obama’s and Clinton’s legislative records. I recommend it highly. It’s a blog, so I can’t link to it, but if you google “I refuse to buy into the Obama hype” it will come up. All the ammo you need is here, Northstarmom.</p>
<p>Does anyone know the name of the blog that NYMomof2 referred to? Lots of blogs came up when I googled the phrase, “I refuse to buy into the Obama hype,” but didn’t see a blog with the info about Obama and Clinton’s legislative records.</p>
<p>Hilzoy at Obsidianwings has done an analysis of Clinton’s and Obama’s voting record. Click on the link and scroll down to Feb. 15, 2008 entry. (disclaimer: Hilzoy is an Obama supporter).</p>
<p>[Obsidian</a> Wings](<a href=“http://obsidianwings.blogs.com/]Obsidian”>http://obsidianwings.blogs.com/)</p>
<p>Northstarmom, the blog is dailykos, and this is a diary by Grassroots Mom, currently at the top of the recommended list (on the right).</p>
<p>dailykos, a shining light of truth :rolleyes:</p>
<p>Well, in this case the DailyKos blog led me to the Obsidian Wings blog where someone has taken the trouble to list all the bills that either Clinton and Obama have sponsored, co-sponsored or added amendments to. I have no reason to think the bills listed are made up. It’s an easy way to compare their accomplishments. I’m thankful someone did it.</p>
<p>(I never knew that naming post offices was a major activity of Senators, they both have bills and I’m sure McCain would too.) :)</p>