What is "belting"?

<p>I received a PM with an excellent question which I think is worth answering here in the general forum. The question was basically, “With the advent of mics, why is there such an emphasis on belting?” The question went on to further cite Merman and Andrea McArdle (the 1st Bway Annie, much later Fantine in Les Miz) as examples of what a belt sound is, and asked “why would anyone want to sound like them?” It went on to propose that the limited appeal of this sound may have taken Broadway outside of the realm of popular, Grammy-winning music.</p>

<p>This question brought to light something I had NEVER considered in all of my posting there - that the ORIGINAL definition of Bway belt (Merman) is now really varied and comprises much more than that original, brassy, “honking” sound - or the STEREOTYPICAL nasal-y “Annie” sound (although many Annies have lovely voices)!!! Technically, female belting can actually scientifically be defined by what the vocal folds are doing (coming together with more force than non-belting and remaining closed longer than they remain open in one vibratory cycle are the two main hallmarks); less technically, it involves taking the chest voice up past the lower passagio. </p>

<p>The “belting” most popular in MT today, especially among younger performers, is much more along the lines of what actual pop stars do, because “pop-contemporary” MT often calls for this: WICKED, LES MIZ, any of Frank Wildhorn’s shows (i.e. JEKYLL AND HYDE), THE WEDDING SINGER, LEGALLY BLONDE, etc. SPRING AWAKENING, one of the newest “pop” MT shows, actually calls for a less strident belt sound, and more of a folky mix. Many - indeed most - female pop stars belt, some healthily (Christina Aguilera, Beyonce) and some less healthily (Stevie Nicks of “old school” Fleetwood Mac comes to mind right away - I’m showing my age! :slight_smile: - as do many American Idol contestants) Indeed, girls who are “natural” belters often aspire to be pop stars, as their voices are suited for this type of music. There are also girls, and women, whose voices lend themselves naturally to a brassier, Mermanesque belt, and that still has a place in MT also, of course - in shows like ANYTHING GOES, etc.</p>

<p>Do all girls have to belt to be successful in MT? NO NO NO NO - especially when you are young and entering college!!! Not all voices are built to belt, just like not all runners are built to sprint! </p>

<p>Does belting HAVE to hurt your voice? NOOOOOOOOO - not if you do it in a limited way, with good and careful training, and UNDERSTAND that it IS innately “tough” on MOST voices, so you have to train and warm up/cool down accordingly.</p>

<p>Belting is a HUGE topic in girls’ MT lives, as many of your know, so I can’t cover everything pertaining to it here…but I hope this info makes it more clear to those unfamiliar with it. There is another style/placement called “mixing,” which MT singers generally agree to mean combining head and chest voice in various proportions to create an powerful and “poppy” sound that is a little less strident than belting - but “mixing” is much less clearly defined overall.</p>

<p>Thanks so much for that post. Very informative.</p>

<p>I learn something new everyday on this board! Thanks for the very explicit definition.</p>

<p>Ethel Merman might have been a belter, but to me she was the most ANNOYING singer I’ve ever heard. May she R.I.P. Sorry, Merman fans…</p>

<p>I wish guys could belt…</p>

<p>Guys do “belt,” too, but it’s a different process for them (which I know a lot less about, to be honest) and it’s not usually as phonotraumatic (meaning injurious to the vocal folds) as female belting. A guy’s “belt” is usually meant to signify a rock voice up high in the tenor range - but it can also just mean “sing really loudly” in ANY range. :)</p>

<p>Ohh… because I’ve been told that I “belt” but it’s mostly just me… sing-yelling… would it be the same??</p>

<p>Probably - that’s the second common definition of “belting” for guys that I mentioned - but there’s no real “correct” (i.e. widely accepted and scientifically outlined) definition of male belting.</p>

<p>What Coach C says is very, very true. Belting needs to be taught by a qualified teacher. Unfortunately anyone can hang out a shingle and call themselves a voice teacher! Coach C, can you please list some credentials that students can look for when trying to find a qualified voice teacher? How can students and parents know if what they are being taught is actually “healthy technique?”</p>

<p>Thanks Coach. Very informative.</p>

<p>Perhaps I don’t really understand the sound of a belt. I’ve seen more than one Eponine, for instance, get really, really loud when singing “On My Own.” Is that belting, or not?</p>

<p>Belting doesn’t really have anything to do with volume of sound, although it’s conventionally associated with a louder sound. </p>

<p>Wikipedia actually has an excellent description of belting!
<a href=“http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Belt_(music)[/url]”>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Belt_(music)&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

<p>A caveat: I don’t endorse the work of either “expert” mentioned in that article simply because I don’t have personal experience with either technique - but the overall info in this article is correct. :)</p>

<p>Thanks Coach! That was really helpful!</p>

<p>Frankly, I think the field of vocal coaching is fraught with myth. There are a lot of teachers out there who will tell kids to do exactly the opposite of whatever some other teacher said to do. It reminds me of the myths surrounding sports when I was growing up, like “water is bad for you if you’ve been exercising hard on a 99 degree day!”</p>

<p>I have only one child left at home, but she does take voice lessons. I’m not chuffed about her teacher. Any suggestions on what I should look for in a new teacher?</p>

<p>You’re so right about there being many “myths,” or at least conflicting philosophies, about voice teaching. (Vocal coaching in its strictest sense is something different, involving choosing material and prepping it for auditions and/or performance primarily from an acting perspective. That’s what I do, and although I do some vocal troubleshooting, esp. with belt technique, I don’t claim to be the “voice builder” that a good vocal TECHNIQUE teacher should be!) Your question and Sarahsmom’s question are very difficult to answer concretely, because as S-mom points out, ANYONE can hang out a shingle, claim to be an “expert,” and, worst of all, amass a devoted following! :wink: I have seen 10 “bad” voice teachers for every good one, in my own experience as a singer and in the students and patients I see regularly. For a more experienced theatre eye and ear like you, I’d say to go with your gut, and if you don’t sense progress, ask around any local university MT programs WHOSE SINGERS YOU ADMIRE or any local performers - people are usually more than glad to refer! :slight_smile: Occasionally, I know people to recommend in various geographic areas, but not always. (It just depends on whether I know anyone there.) Once you find the teacher, ask to OBSERVE a lesson (at least a trial lesson with your child), and then interview the teacher about:</p>

<ol>
<li><p>overall teaching philosophy regarding BUILDING a voice - does she (the teacher) work on stripping away bad habits first, further strengthening what is already strong and letting the bad habits fall into “good” place, etc? (There are few specified approaches as there are with acting - aka Meisner, the Stanislavskian Method, etc. - and those specified programs that do exist are ALL controversial to at least a certain extent among medical voice professionals - Seth Riggs’ speech-level singing and Estill are the best-known methods). As with acting, I personally prefer a teacher who is not a “cookbook” teacher, following one prescribed system, but rather a teacher who responds to each student’s individual needs with an eclectic approach.</p></li>
<li><p>For a female student - what is the teacher’s view on and approach to belting? If she says, “I do not endorse that,” I’d consider going elsewhere. She (or he) SHOULD understand and know how to safely teach (paying attention to the physiologic factors summarized in the wikipedia article) belt, even if she deems your daughter not ready to belt or not really vocally suited to belting overall. Any teacher who philosophically disagrees with belting is impeding the growth potential of future MT singers - as belt IS “needed” for girls IF POSSIBLE. The flip side of this should be considered, too - the teacher should approach ALL singing with a bel canto base (also described in the article) and then understand how to shift this into different styles of singing!</p></li>
<li><p>what do they actually WORK ON in lessons? The teacher should have a CLEARLY ORGANIZED answer - and “rep” or “songs” is a BAD answer!!! They should focus on coordination of breath, relaxation of all musculature so there is no “forcing” the sound, and proper production of vowels - these are a singer’s big tools.</p></li>
<li><p>knowledge of medical voice - a teacher shouldn’t be expected to be an expert (b/c that is VERY specialized training not done in voice performance programs) - but a teacher SHOULD constantly be listening for vocal difficulty and immediately refer to a laryngologist (voice-specialist ENT) if problems evidence themselves (persistent raspiness 2+ weeks after being sick, a particularly airy sound in certain parts of the range. etc.)</p></li>
</ol>

<p>It is EXTREMELY hard to find a voice teacher who is a knowledgeable voice builder. I wish this weren’t the case, but it is. And these people are hardly ever rep experts ALSO - there simply isn’t time for them to be expert in everything!</p>

<p>Coach:</p>

<p>Many, MANY thanks for your time and expertise. It’s much appreciated!</p>

<p>Tarhunt - Look for teachers associated with NATS - the National Association of Teachers of Singing:</p>

<p><a href=“http://www.nats.org/index.php[/url]”>http://www.nats.org/index.php&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

<p>There should be a local chapter with a local website and a list of teachers accepting new students. If you live in the Pacific Northwest I can recommend some excellent teachers.</p>

<p>Also look at:</p>

<p><a href=“http://vocalist.org/[/url]”>http://vocalist.org/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

<p>This is one of the excellent resources on the web. Singing is very physical, but it is also very personal. You may find the best teacher in your area, but the teacher may not be the best for your child.</p>

<p>If you’d like to know more you may contact me privately. I have a child who loved to sing and being non musical I had to educate myself about singing. We went from teacher to teacher until her freshman year of high school when she found a teacher she both loved and respected. She still works with her during her breaks home from college.</p>

<p>And just remember: just because someone is a singer herself (or himself) does not mean that that person can TEACH singing and teach it properly.</p>

<p>Thanks, everyone, for the very valuable information. Wish I’d had it for the first seven children, but #8 may benefit.</p>

<p>Thanks again.</p>