<p>WHat is the average sat range for UCLA? 2100s ??</p>
<p><a href=“http://www.admissions.ucla.edu/Prospect/Adm_fr/Frosh_Prof06.htm[/url]”>http://www.admissions.ucla.edu/Prospect/Adm_fr/Frosh_Prof06.htm</a></p>
<p>The average SAT score for admitted students is a 2010.</p>
<p>Keep in mind that SAT II matters a whole lot more than SAT I.</p>
<p>I think the SAT is worth more now. It used to be the SAT II. How the UCs figure out your test score for scholarships before was add SAT II Writing + SAT II Math + SAT II Other Subject + SAT Reading + SAT Math = #/4000. Before there were three tests for the SAT IIs, now there are two. The SAT II Writing turned into the SAT I Writing for the new SAT, so it’s kind of like the same as before.</p>
<p>Yeah, the SAT is definitely worth more…</p>
<p>sat is worth around double the sat 2’s (form waht ive heard) and the average sat for 2008 of enrolled applicants was a 1900. ACT info also available:</p>
<p>[UCLA</a> Undergrad Admissions: Profile of Admitted Freshmen, Fall 2008](<a href=“http://www.admissions.ucla.edu/Prospect/Adm_fr/Frosh_Prof08.htm]UCLA”>http://www.admissions.ucla.edu/Prospect/Adm_fr/Frosh_Prof08.htm)</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>I was not aware that this was ever the case…doesn’t make much sense anyways.</p>
<p>~3 year old bump.</p>
<p>Edit: Post #1000!</p>
<p>I seriously doubt that SAT II matters more than SAT I especially in light of the Regents recent vote to eliminate the SAT II requirement as of, I believe, 2013.</p>
<p>Bad Dad id right. SAT Reasoning will become the sole test scores required by the UCs. However, the almighty UC GPA towers over all SAT scores. The single most important determinant of admission is your UC GPA.</p>
<p>^ agree with thinkingofyou</p>