<p>Really anything with the word “tech” in it but star billing goes to Caltech as I have witnessed it’s awkwardness firsthand.</p>
<p>Where do you get that MIT has a high STD rate? It seems pretty off to me.</p>
<p>As a Wes student, I’d say you’re wrong to include it on this list, in the way you’ve described it.</p>
<p>If you mean, “school for kids who were kind of “weird”/“unpopular”/“quirky” in high school,” than Wes is a good choice. But Wes kids DEFINITELY do more than study (most are SUPER involved in ECs), and almost everyone goes out on the weekends, whether that be to a party, or to a movie.</p>
<p>The same goes for Oberlin, mentioned above.</p>
<p>Disagree about MIT being social. The guys I know there have literally never spoken to a girl in anything other than an academic context.</p>
<p>yeah but those are just “they guys you know there”… they don’t necessarily represent the student body as a whole. Fact is, every school has quirky weird kids who have problems with being social.</p>
<p>^^Eh, anecdotal evidence isn’t really appropriate in this case. I’d say that MIT is easily more social than say, CalTech, when one speaks in terms of the generalizations that we are using here.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Quite true.</p>
<p>Case has so many socially inept students. I love that everyone is a bit offbeat and quirky. And there are plenty who hibernate in study rooms for semesters at a time and never socialize.</p>
<p>i feel kinda of bad for these kids.
they are missing out on so much! GET OUT AND EXPERIENCE THE WORLD!</p>
<p>Oh, but you are missing out on so much by not playing WoW 24/7 …okay, that’s a bit of an exaggeration… 20/7.</p>
<p>Rice, Caltech, MIT and Reed possibly…</p>
<p>
Well, by that criterion alone, MIT shouldn’t appear on the list either.</p>
<p>
Whoa. I’ve seen the “highest STD rate” finger been pointed at UCSB, JMU, and Bowling Green before, but never MIT…</p>