What will the final straw be for Bush 'defenderers?'

<p>Zoos, all of the news articles discuss the reasons that Bush is losing his base. I don’t know why you think this is hidden info. Here it is in black and white. There are plenty more links like this one.</p>

<p><a href=“http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/05/10/AR2006051002040.html[/url]”>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/05/10/AR2006051002040.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

<p>“Disaffection over spending and immigration have caused conservatives to take flight from President Bush and the Republican Congress at a rapid pace in recent weeks, sending Bush’s approval ratings to record lows and presenting a new threat to the GOP’s 12-year reign on Capitol Hill, according to White House officials, lawmakers and new polling data.”</p>

<p>“But, frankly, the idea that corruption (in the past 5 years) is as endemic to Democrats as to the Republicans is an idea-spin put out by the Republican spinmeisters, without even a hint of evidence. It just ain’t so. Now, if the Dems happened to be in power, would it have been so? That’s anyone’s guess. But they ain’t.”</p>

<p>They haven’t been in power for over five years, so that time constraint makes a response to this request pretty near impossible.</p>

<p>“Zoos, all of the news articles discuss the reasons that Bush is losing his base. I don’t know why you think this is hidden info. Here it is in black and white. There are plenty more links like this one.”</p>

<p>You’re absolutely right about that article and it is pretty fair, but over the course of the free fall, most articles in the mainstream media haven’t been so fair and have implied (or stated) that conservatives are some sort of crazy people who hate immigrants and oppose Bush on his only reasonable issue. I’m talking long view here.</p>

<p>Non-Comprehensive List:</p>

<p>Berger
McGreevey
Hikind
Siegelman (Alabama)
Dyer (Orlando)
Wilder (Tennessee)</p>

<p>“They haven’t been in power for over five years, so that time constraint makes a response to this request pretty near impossible.”</p>

<p>So you are in fact agreeing with me - that corruption is currently far, far more endemic among Republicans than among Democrats, despite the Republican spinmeisters.</p>

<p>Zoosermom, you can add Torricelli, Jefferson and Mollohan to your list.</p>

<p>“So you are in fact agreeing with me - that corruption is currently far, far more endemic among Republicans than among Democrats, despite the Republican spinmeisters.”</p>

<p>Absolutely not, and please don’t attribute to me words or opinions that I haven’t expressed. I don’t, for one minute, believe republicans are more corrupt than democrats. </p>

<p>What I said was (a) corruption is endemic; and (b) the artificial time constraint on the last five years is limiting to what can be reported. Especially since there are some scandals that span that time period.</p>

<p>The team in power will be the one that people will try to influence. Why bother with the others??</p>

<p>are republicans at least as currupt?</p>

<p>And that team can say NO. but gosh, many haven’t</p>

<p>For the party of intergirty, it is sorely lacking, no matter what you want to believe</p>

<p>Argue all you want, the proof is out there and if want to deny, go ahead</p>

<p>“are republicans at least as currupt?”</p>

<p>Abso-frickin-lutely.</p>

<p>Unfortunately, it seems that whenever a party has control of both houses of Congress and the presidency, corruption reigns. There’s a reason the Dems were booted out of Congress in 1994. The voters usually take care of one-sided situations in fairly short order.</p>

<p>Certainly. The facts are pretty clear.</p>

<p>There are still some who think what Clinton did to warrant impeachment was worse than what little Bush has done. At least big Bush had sense enough to hire Quayle as impeachment insurance.</p>

<p>

I certainly agree with these statements.</p>

<p>But I have a deep-held feeling that the transgressions of this President - the war, the deficit and spiraling debt, international relationships, and environmental policies - are going to have a longer-lasting detrimental effect on this country in the long run that previous administrations, Republican or Democrat.</p>

<p>“But I have a deep-held feeling that the transgressions of this President - the war, the deficit and spiraling debt, international relationships, and environmental policies - are going to have a longer-lasting detrimental effect on this country in the long run that previous administrations, Republican or Democrat.”</p>

<p>I couldn’t agree more, digmedia.</p>

<p>there will be no last straw for the remaining Bush defenders.</p>

<p>Correct; no matter how many land in jail, no matter how many die in vain, no matter how much debt our children suffer, a few will see Bush and his thugs as heroes forever.</p>

<p>I call it the cult of bush…</p>

<p>(ducking)</p>

<p>On cults and uncritical supporters:</p>

<p>Keep in mind that at the height of the Watergate scandal, about 23% of the country backed Nixon!</p>

<p>Shortly before Joe McCarthy was censured by the Senate - after all of his excesses were public knowledge - he still enjoyed 35% support!</p>