<p>Singersmom, It’s my understanding that the bride’s bouquet, and only her bouquet, has ALWAYS been the GROOM"S, not his parents’ responsibility. However, since most bride’s want their flowers to co-ordinate with all the others, over time, it’s become common for the groom or his parents to pay for all the flowers. However, old etiquette books say only the bride’s bouquet is the groom’s responsibiity. </p>
<p>I just read a light “chick-lit” book by Meg Cabot, best known as author of “The Princess Diaries.” It’s about a wedding planner of sorts. The book includes a “traditional” breakdown of expenses. I was rather surprised by how many things are the responsibility of the bride and groom. For example, the bride and groom, not parents, are responsible for photography. The groom is responsible for the hotel bill of his ushers and gifts to them, the marriage license, the bride’s flowers. </p>
<p>The groom’s family was responsible for transportation. At a lot of weddings these days, transportation is provided. Thus, if your out of town guests are staying in a hotel, it’s common to hire a bus to pick them up there, take them to the church/synogogue/temple/ town hall, ferry them to the reception, and back to the hotel. The idea is to avoid a situation in which someone is trying to wrestle Uncle Joe’s car keys away from him at the end of the night because he shouldn’t be driving–or worse, Uncle Joe drives drunk and hurts or kills himself and/or someone else. Of course, it also avoids the situation in which people get lost on the way to the reception because they missed a turn. Anyway, if a work of fiction can be counted on for such things, the transportation is the groom’s parents’ responsibility. I suspect this breakdown was made in the days in which the wedding was usually in the bride’s hometown, so most of the out of town guests were on the groom’s side. </p>
<p>My kid’s friends have a different “rule”–they say one-third, one-third, one-third. Thus, the couple is expected to pay for one-third, and each set of parents pays for one-third. But in calculating that third, they include cost of attendance. So, if the couple is marrying in LA and the groom’s parents are flying in from New York, my kid and friends include the airfare and hotel in the one-third. If the bride’s parents host the wedding in their hometown and the groom’s parents are coming a great distance, then the bride’s parents foot more of the bill.</p>
<p>In any event, I don’t think anyone should assume that the bride’s parents will pay for a wedding, let alone that some etiquette book will determine who pays for what. And I think that’s especially true if the groom’s parents want any say in the wedding. There are other circumstances in which it makes sense for the groom’s parents to foot the bill. For example, one woman I know converted to her husband’s faith prior to their marriage. This was hard for her parents to accept, and they certainly had no idea of how to arrange a wedding in that faith. The groom’s parents were delighted by the conversion, the wedding took place in their house of worship, and they picked up the tab. They could afford it and somehow expecting the bride’s parents to pay for a wedding they weren’t happy about seemed like pouring salt into wounds.</p>