<p><a href=“http://i1053.■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■/albums/s480/desuetudes/21-1.png[/url]”>http://i1053.■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■/albums/s480/desuetudes/21-1.png</a></p>
<p>I would have to go with C.</p>
<p>based on my knowledge of ninth grade bio, i remember something about choice A.</p>
<p>A, I’d say. Distilled it’s just paraphrasing Darwin’s theory; it’s just prolix.</p>
<p>I’d go with C as well. The “constant use” part of A makes it not the best choice. It’s kind of a bad question, though. I doubt it’s official.</p>
<p>Malbright, what book are you getting these from?</p>
<p>absolutely not A.it’s Lamarck’s idea.</p>
<p>Its C.</p>
<p>The constant use of something doesn’t make it dominant. Do you see people born without an appendix? We hardly use them, so why doesn’t it go away or get replaced? It only matters if an organism in a species is fit, not when it doesn’t use a part of it’s body. This gives me reason to believe that A is not the correct answer.</p>
<p>C, on the other hand, is correct because slight variations in organisms is true, or else we would all look like the same person and then probably would die out. A bird could grow up to have a larger beak than the rest of its species and then it would, for example, be able to reach farther in crevices and eat more insects. This then would allow the bird to get more energy and a greater chance to be more fit among its species.</p>