<p>I didn’t want to hijack the transfers thread, so here is a more thorough explanation of how Maryland’s transfer policy is keeping out top students (namely me).</p>
<p>Applied to transfer as a Junior for Aerospace Engineering (minus ENAE 100/200 and 283)
Status: Rejected for general admission to university</p>
<p>Carnegie Mellon GPA (+1 summer class at Pitt): 1.675 @ 83 credits (2001-2004)
Montgomery College GPA: 4.000 @ 70 credits (2011-2013)
Cumulative GPA: 2.739 This is why I was rejected (not by the Clark School, but general admissions).
Graduation: May 2013 w/Honors, Double Associate of Science in Aerospace Engineering, Materials Science and Engineering</p>
<p>EC/Accomplishments:
One a handful of graduating 4.0 students interviewed for the Montgomery College Board of Trustees Scholarship and chance to speak for the 2013 commencement ceremony (today actually, will know by end of April).
1 of 3 students invited to participate at the National Academies’ National Summit on STEM education in Community Colleges
1 of 2 engineering students asked to attend to a legislative reception to lobby, alongside the college president and board of trustees, state law makers for the college’s capital projects (STEM related buildings).
College Math-Science Center Chemistry Tutor (only non-faculty chem tutor), CRLA Certified. 1 of 2 part time jobs (other remote IT support).
Member Phi Theta Kappa Honor Society
Deans List 5x</p>
<p>Personal Info:
Maryland homeowner <– for those of you young people, that means wife and I pay thousands in state taxes and fees (also why I can’t look at schools outside of the area)
Stay-at-home parent (wife works 8-5:30 M-F I’m home with daughter during that time), was going to switch her to daycare so I could go full time during the day. Between taking care of her, classes, work, and homework I am pulling 80-90 hour weeks (when spring break hit I slept for about 5 days straight). </p>
<p>Of note:
General admissions officer “these grades are from what, like 12 years ago?” “3.0 isn’t a hard cutoff, it’s just worded that way to help cut down the number of non-competitive students applications” Riiiiiggghhhttt.</p>
<p>Associate Dean of Clark School (the person who gives the thumbs up or down on internal appeal cases for engineering) says “I’ll go to bat for you, but I don’t think admissions will let you into the university.” Pardon me, but if the person who has autonomy to make or break appeal decisions into a LEP says that, something is wrong.</p>
<p>Phrases either said to me or that I have gleaned either from emails or recommendations letters (when possible):
“… he is one of the brightest students I have ever taught.”</p>
<p>“His mastery level of the subject matter and his deep and high cognitive level in analyzing the concepts is simply admirable.”</p>
<p>“He is the type who has strong self discipline and can improve and enhance his knowledge on his own.”</p>
<p>Math professor “For students like you, I don’t give bonus points”</p>
<p>English teacher “You should consider the honors program”</p>
<p>OChem “You’d be a good candidate for honors Ochem II if you decide to go that route.”</p>
<p>Adjunct professor “Out of a pool of hundreds I’ve seen in my classes, I can confidentially say he is my best student”</p>
<p>Electrical Engineering professor “I am using his lab reports as material to help teach the class.” </p>
<p>Professor of ~20 years - “he is in the top 3%”</p>
<p>Here’s Maryland’s form letter wording
“…we are only able to admit students whose records show strong academic performances and above average grades.”</p>
<p>Do you see the disconnect?</p>