Which ACT Review book is better

<p>PR’s Cracking the ACT </p>

<p>OR</p>

<p>The Real ACT prep guide</p>

<p>Nothing beats the Real ACT because it’s the only one with the real tests… but the PR is good for the other review… I’d suggest both, but if you can only get one get the real ACT</p>

<p>which one is better? yes.</p>

<p>in other words, if in doubt, get both.</p>

<p>Real ACT’s only leg up is that its tests are real acts.</p>

<p>I think I should add too that it depends what your score range is. A lot of people (including myself) on this board like the Real ACT because it offers exact tests from past administrations, which is what you need to raise your score when you’re in the 33+ range. However, the review part is useless. So if you’re under 30 or so, the Princeton Review is really helpful because it gives you all the rules, formulas, etc. you need to know and teaches you how to maximize your score. And its practice tests are fairly accurate as well.</p>