<p>But the quote specifically says:
“So If I’m a guy and I ‘identify’ as a woman…”
AND YOU SAID THE LOGIC WAS SOUND???</p>
<p>LOGIC CONTRADICTION?</p>
<p>I can “identify” as Native American - and actually be a descendant of pre-Columbian inhabitants of the Americas - but if I’m not registered with a tribe, I’m not going to be evaluated as a minority by the admissions office.</p>
<p>Ok. This is what I have learned so far.</p>
<p>Sex = BIOLOGICAL GENDER.
Gender = THE OFFICIAL GENDER GIVEN BY SOCIETY.</p>
<p>I am a genius.</p>
<p>Wait, so there are ‘females’ with dicks(excluding hermaphrodites)?</p>
<p>Women. Obvious reasons are obvious.</p>
<p>Like I said, the requirements vary by state.</p>
<p>Ok. Gotcha.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>-------> this
</p>
<p>LOGIC CONTRADICTION?</p>
<p>WHOAAAA??? explain?</p>
<p>I love this huge argument I started, hahahaha</p>
<p>If females are as manipulative as you say and get guys to do what they want, then guys are dumbasses (or just horny as hell).</p>
<p>^ it’s the latter.</p>
<p>Whoa, way to reinforce patriarchal mythologies of woman as temptress (as embodied by Delilah and anthropological evidence of belief of mana transfer through intercourse), guys!</p>
<p>milancad, stop arguing semantics. race may be a social construct, but gender is not. and in any case, this isn’t anthropology class. </p>
<p>on point, i think both are equally manipulative. girls are just more intentionally manipulative. for example, upperclassmen tend to go for freshman/sophomore girls. they might not realize it, but it’s because that soph girl will be more likely to get with you on the basis of being intimidated or impressed, while that senior girl is probably more independent. and then there are males like Hitler who epitomize manipulation.</p>