I am an Asian female and I’m applying to Yale through SCEA. I just received my ACT score which is a 33. I took the old SAT and got a 2100. I also took the New SAT and got a 1520. (All of these are one sitting). I took the subject tests twice and got terrible scores: 650 and 610 on Chemistry and 660 and 680 on Math 2.
My ACT is a little low for Yale. My 1520 New SAT is a pretty good score. But Yale’s policy is that you must send all scores from one testing company. Would it be better to just send my ACT rather than send all the SAT scores?
I think you are not required to report SAT II scores if you don’t want to. I could be wrong but that’s my read of this…
“Yale does participate in Score Choice for the reporting of SAT Subject Tests. You may wait to receive your score results before deciding which scores, if any, you would like to send to Yale. Please keep our deadlines in mind, however, as you consider that option. If you are applying Early Action to Yale and are taking Subject Tests on the November test date, we do not recommend using Score Choice. For November results to be considered by the admissions committee we need to receive them as soon as they are available. If you are submitting all of your ACT with writing results, you may send whatever SAT Subject Tests you like and you are not required to submit any SAT scores…”
Therefore I would recommend “hiding” the 2100 score by NOT reporting any of your SAT scores (including the 1520). Also, as Yale requires the new SAT with WRITING, so your 1520 SAT does NOT meet Yale’s requirements, and Admissions will ignore the 1520 score: http://admissions.yale.edu/standardized-testing
Therefore, your only viable choice for Yale (and HPSM et al) is to report the 33 ACT and submit SAT Subject tests (which you can use score-choice for, hiding your SAT tests).
FWIW: a 33 ACT is about a 1500-1510 on the new SAT, so the scores are almost equal. Keep in mind that admission to Yale (and other selective schools) is not a meritocracy, meaning students with higher scores do not always get accepted over applicants with lower scores. I’ve posted this several times, but here it is again
I just wanted to point out that the assertion that “Asian Americans, Lee says, are penalized by 50 points — in other words, they had to do that much better to win admission…” is not universally agreed upon. When the US govt looked into it at P’ton, it found no evidence of that.
Selective colleges consider URM status or full pays or pianists or athletes as your second link points out, that’s a fact. But beyond that, statements like “50 points more for Asians” or whatever is not.