<p>^<a href=“@goingmeta”>B</a> **Wow, almost all your arguments are based on semantics and nothing more. If you don’t have any good arguments, then there is no need to be so obnoxious.</p>
<p>If you want to refute anybody’s comments or make any cogent arguments, attack anti-affirmative action comments directly without semantics or bringing up something that is unrelated to affirmative action.</p>
<p>And, no I didn’t make assumptions, I know for a fact these people were accepted on the basis of affirmative action. Isn’t that comment another assumption you just made; that I assumed these outliers were because of affirmative action?</p>
<p>^^
The Ivies, all of which are private, are known to provide quality education, which is acknowledged by the entire world. They receive vast amounts of federal aid. **How on earth does race-based affirmative action benefit them?
**
I oppose it because I think America should be a meritocracy. If a university only cares about its own advancement, I feel that it is unjust. And how does affirmative action promote the university’s interests? You said that those active in athletics became active leaders. What does that have to do with race-based affirmative action?</p>
<p>^^^^^^^^^^
very nice empty threat</p>