Why am I stuggling so hard on the ACT?

<p>Hi, i’ve taken the ACT twice my junior year with no prep and I got a 22 twice. I know I haven’t studied but I wanted to see where I was without studying and everyone talks about getting 27+ without studying. Im a pretty smart student, I take the hardest classes available to me and im a 4.0 student. I understand that the ACT doesn’t exactly test knowledge and is more of a standardized test but I do score in the top 90% of our state testing.</p>

<p>I got a 20 on my english and on my social studies/sciences sbscore i got a 15 while on arts/literature i got a 5. On the reading and science I did feel a little but rushed on time and I had to guess on 5 or 6 problems.</p>

<p>I’m a good student… why am i getting such low scores!</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>Why did you take it twice then? You’d only need to have taken it once to figure that out, and you could have taken a practice test instead.</p>

<p>The ACT isn’t like most tests that you take in school. </p>

<p>The English test is pretty straightforward. With the exception of a few rhetoric questions, ACT doesn’t try to trick you at all. You’re simply required to know the basic conventions of the English language and also how to improve sentences/paragraphs. Look at your subscores: if you scores poorly on the usage/mechanics section, then you can improve easily with a prep book; if you struggled on the rhetorics sections, then practice tests will help you learn the format of the test and what ACT is “looking for” when they create the answer choices.</p>

<p>The math section is the most like a comprehensive test that you will take in school. It has material from geometry, algebra I and II, and trigonometry courses that you are expected to have taken prior to the test. The test is also formatted in a manner that arranges the questions, for the most part, in order of difficult. The easiest at the beginning and the hardest at the end. Test prep books are quite comprehensive in this section, but it takes quite a while to cover everything. Look at your lowest subsections and start there.</p>

<p>Judging by the discrepancy in your reading subscores, you’re likely spending too much time on individual passages. You shouldn’t have a ten point difference between two subsections. I recommend doing practice tests and trying to get the test done within the time parameters. Remember this: your goal shouldn’t be to get a perfect score, it should rather be to get the highest score that you can get. If you’re not already within the range of 30+, then abandon your hopes of a 36 and start working economically. If a question appears that it will take you more than 1 minute to solve (on the reading section), skip it. Get that question wrong. If you spend several minutes searching the passage to find the answer, you may get that question right, but you just lost valuable time to finish the section.</p>

<p>On a science test, you’ll learn chapters one and two and then have a test on them. Then you’ll learn chapters three and four and then have a test on those. ACT can’t know what science courses everyone has taken though, so they made their test a science reasoning test; it is basically graph interpretation. You’re expected to have taken a chemistry, biology, and physical science course before taking the test, but it is not necessary (though it will certainly help!). There are normally 1-3 questions that will require mediocre esoteric knowledge, the rest will be entirely deducible from the graphs/passage. Some people recommend that you don’t read the passages at all; personally, I always read them. It’s up to you to determine the best strategy to encompass the test. Just remember, always work economically. There’s no point in spending ages on a single problem.</p>

<hr>

<p>I always bring a watch and time myself throughout every section of the test. You don’t need to do this, but keep this data in mind. On the English section, you have 45 minutes to do 75 problems. The questions are separated into 5 passages of 15 questions each. This means that in order to complete the test, you have an average of 9 minutes to do a single passage. If you find yourself at question 13 when you’re 9 minutes into it, then you need to work faster. </p>

<p>The math section is simply to time yourself on. You have 60 questions to do in 60 minutes; this means that you have one minute per question. The questions are arranged in order of difficulty, so try to do the first 35 or so questions in 30-40 seconds each and give yourself extra time to do the final third of the test. </p>

<p>The reading section will kill you for time. It is 40 questions to do in 35 minutes. You have less than a minute to do each question. The test is categorized into four sections, always in the same order: prose fiction, social science, humanities, science. Each section has 10 questions. I try to give me self 35/4 (8:45) minutes to do each section of the test. Depending on how fast of a reader you are, make sure that each passage is somewhere around this time frame. I give myself 4 minutes to read and mark the passage, and then the remainder of the time to answer questions. This is entirely adjustable according to your reading speed.</p>

<p>The science test is categorized into seven sections. You have 40 questions to do in 35 minutes. This test is likely to have a great time limitation as well. There’s not much to say for a universal template for the science section, except to work efficiently and leave the conflicting viewpoints passage for last. Also, don’t get caught up in the unnecessary jargon of the test, for this reason many people recommend to not even read the passages but rather to go straight to the questions. If this works for you, then by all means do it. Also, note that each passage will have a different number of questions associated with it. This makes it hard to time yourself on. Also note that you’re free to skip around, just make sure that you mark appropriately on the answer sheet! I do the passages that look like they pertain to physics first, then chemistry, then biology. (A quick glance of course! I shouldn’t take you more than 15-30 seconds to flip pages/skip passages and save them for later.)</p>

<hr>

<p>Remember that there is not penalty for guessing. Ultimately, there is but one way to improve in a non-superficial manner: you have to put time and effort into studying. If your general curriculum does not prepare you properly for the test (I would say that only my math curriculum did this for me), then go and buy a practice book and then do it. Also, do practice tests. After completing them, figure out the answers to questions that you were unsure of or got wrong so that you’ll be able to finish them with ease on the actual test. You’re lucky enough to have the entire summer to prepare.</p>

<p>Just to add on, maybe you’d find the SAT easier, especially if you had happened to have a problem with the ACT time restrictions.</p>

<p>22 isn’t horrid. :confused: I average around a 21-23 on practice test but score 28+ on the real thing (probably 30+ on the December ACT). Idk y practice test are so much more difficult for me… :confused: I used Kaplan online for my practice test.</p>

<p>I’m planning on taking the ACT for the first time in June. I’m currently a sophomore. I hope to get a composite score of 31. I doubt that will happen my first time because I’ve not taken trig yet, but I have my fingers crossed. </p>

<p>Math is, by far, my worst subject. I have a few questions concerning that part of the ACT. Are graphing calculators necessary? One of my friends told me that you have to graph circles, parabolas etc. That really scares me because I took algebra II last year and I’ve forgotten how to do any of that. For those of you who have taken the ACT, how difficult is the math section? </p>

<p>I’ve also heard that the science section is hard. One of my friends said that he didn’t think I would be able to get a 32, but I’ll see about that…</p>

<p>I bought Barron’s 36, so hopefully that will help me.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>No calculator is necessary on the ACT, but a graphing calculator is most recommended and then a scientific calculator if you don’t have a graphing calculator. You’ll likely need to know the formulae for circles, parabolas, etc, but you don’t need to graph them. (You can’t even graph those on a calculator, as they’re not defined as functions.) Trigonometry only encompasses 4 questions on the ACT, and 2 of them are guaranteed to be simple sine/cosine/tangent problems. (AKA you can be guaranteed to get 2 of the 4 trig questions correct with 30 minutes of studying.) It’s really not that hard, you can do it, just have confidence.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>It sounds cliche, but the science section is as hard as you make it. It purposefully includes complicated words and formulae, even though you won’t use those. Everything (with the exception of about 1-3 questions) is included in the passage or can be inferred directly from it. Just have confidence and you’ll do fine. (P.S. Barron’s books are harder than the actual test. Don’t get discouraged if you do poorly on them.)</p>

<p>OregonSenior: Barron’s books are what I need to use, right? </p>

<p>I’ll need a crash course on simple trigonometry. I don’t have a clue about it. </p>

<p>I’m also not really sure how to use a graphing calculator. I have a scientific calculator, but will it be useful when I’m graphing parabolas and circles? Thanks for the encouragement, by the way. </p>

<p>Is the science section mainly just interpreting graphs and stuff?</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>I used Barron’s for math and thought that it was great. Barron’s is good for everything but English. </p>

<p>

</p>

<p>It’s as simple as looking at two angles and one side and then putting those values into your calculator. I recommend spending a lunch or two with a math teacher to learn it though, considering that you’ve never taken it before. Barron’s book is good, but a teacher would be far better.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>I’d recommend that you go and buy a graphing calculator and then use it. If you’re a sophomore, it’ll likely be quite handy. On the ACT, none of the questions require you to graph something - it can be quite helpful. Every problem that you can graph can also be solved algebraically, which should be much faster. I tend to only graph problems that require me to see where lines intersect. Basically, there’s an input screen where you enter the X side of the function. (Y=X). After that, the calculator will graph the function. It really is quite simple. </p>

<p>

</p>

<p>That’s the only thing that the science section is. Doing a practice test is the best way to “get the feel” of the science section.</p>

<p>OregonSenior: I’ll definitely go talk to my teacher about helping me. I’m glad to hear that about the science section. I feel more confident with it. I’ll get a graphing calculator as soon as possible. Thanks for all of your help.</p>

<p>No problem, best of luck! :)</p>

<p>OregonSenior: Thanks again!</p>

<p>No one should take a standardized test just to see “how I would do.” That is not only looked negatively but strongly discouraged.</p>

<p>Chelsea — my daughter took the SATS and the ACT and she did better on the latter. Many students skew one way or the other on these tests. You need to go to Barnes & Noble and get a good test prep book, or order one from Amazon. Then you need to spend real time using it! : – ) </p>

<p>The ACT does not play mind games; they test you on what you really know. Also, they do not penalize for guesses. The SAT does.</p>