<p>He has plenty of leadership experience as a community organizer in the inner city. </p>
<p>He is exceptionally well educated from Harvard Law. </p>
<p>He accomplished as much in the senate in 2 years as Hillary did in 8. </p>
<p>And Bush had plenty of “experience” before he took office, and look how that turned out…</p>
<p>I want to see the evidence that Hillary has significantly more qualifications to be President of the United States then Obama. And how would this “experience” insure that she would turn out to be better than the rest of the past “experienced” presidents who messed up the country. </p>
<p>And why are we continuing to overlook the fact that the Clinton family is a house of liars who lie about campaign funds and can’t hold back from cheating on their spouses while they are representing the people of this entire country to the world? </p>
<p>Why would we let ourselves be embarrassed and condone that behavior?</p>
<p>“If Ms. Clinton can’t even persuade her own husband, the president at that, to keep it in his pants around interns, how is she possibly going to persuade congress to accept her ideas?”</p>
<p>Being President is probably the most difficult position in America. Demonstrated experience running a major corporation, organization, or a state would constitute adequate experience to run the Federal government. There must be thousands and thousands of people with more experience than Obama. The presidency should not be an on the job learning experience and that is the situation we would be in if Obama is elected.</p>
<p>However, Clinton and McCain aren’t among them. Neither have any executive experience.</p>
<p>And there is not a demonstrated advantage to ‘experienced’ candidates. JFK, Lincoln, and FDR are all ‘inexperienced’, Bush was experienced, Carter’s resume was pretty solid, and so on.</p>
<p>That’s her problem (or one among many). I pay good money for my government to lie to me, and I expect them to do it well. ;)</p>
<p>Bill wasn’t very good at it either. When you are charged with committing genocide on national tv, I expect a President’s spokesperson to deny it vociferously rather than embracing it.</p>