Why is Al Jazeera and Link TV not widely available?

<p>As a child, I listened to Radio Moscow, during the cold war, to hear the Soviet
perspective, even though much of it was propaganda. I particularly remember how the U2 crisis was handled. </p>

<p>Link TV (Mosaic) and Al Jazeera provide a different perspective, which is of value in understanding how the middle east views America and the world. This material should be available to those who wish to see all perspectives. </p>

<p>Please comment on the powers that are preventing important media from being seen by Americans.</p>

<p>This is presented as an intellectual discussion, not as a defense for Al Jazeera; Americans should have the right to decide for themselves whether to watch.</p>

<p>It would be particularly valuable if posters indicate if they have ever seen
unedited versions and of which show. I have watched Mosaic which is an extraordinary resource of different perspectives.</p>

<ol>
<li>You have a good point.</li>
<li><a href=“http://english.aljazeera.net%5B/url%5D”>http://english.aljazeera.net</a> –
You can get a 15 minute low bandwidth news stream for free. It changes daily.</li>
</ol>

<p>For $5.95/month, you can subscribe to a high bandwidth, 24/7 live stream. </p>

<p>So basically you can see it whenever you want on your computer, but not on your t.v. set. As I recall, back when I used to listen to Radio Moscow in the 60’s, we needed a short wave radio to get it… so things really aren’t all that different.</p>

<p>Because no sponsors wants to be associated with the network.</p>

<p>Shoot the messenger</p>

<p>My friend gets it on digital cable…I guess that’s not widely available, but it’s there. Most Arabic families i know do watch it.</p>

<p>I have a friend who is married to a Palestinian Arab. They have a big giant satellite dish, and get AJ in Arabic. She is sure the neighbors love it. :)</p>

<p>The dish? hehehehe</p>

<p>I think the Arabic version is available via satellite – it is the newly launched English version with Dave Marash that is not available via cable. As I noted above, it IS available via streaming media on the internet, to paid subscribers.</p>

<p>(If Al Jazeera starts getting a lot of $$$ from those paid subscriptions, maybe the cable broadcast companies will change their view. At $5.95/month, it could add up. )</p>

<p>Mosaic is a compilation of 5-6 newscasts from Beirut, Dubai, Tehran,
Jerusalem etc, all translated into English. On the web it can be viewed at linktv. What is fascinating for intellectuals is how similar the news from Tehran is to news from other syndicated outlets. For example, on the night after the election, pure data was presented including which races still hung in the balance. It is not always so. Casualties are referred to as martyrs. At times it is painful to watch, but beheadings are not shown. It is for the most part anti-Israeli but it is a lot freer than most of us, certainly myself would have expected.</p>

<p>This is not a dialog for the dull who are convinced that every Iranian is out to attack us. It is meant to suggest that the power of media is not being used to foster better relationships between peoples. Not necessarily nations, but peoples.</p>

<p>I do not have 100 channels, but Linktv is shown on public television from 1-4am in Northern California, and is free on the web. </p>

<p>It was my impression, before the invasion, that a war with Iraq could not last.
The press would be showing the carnage inflicted by both sides, the grief experienced by our GIs and their families, and the American public would not tolerate it for very long. Was I wrong. </p>

<p>The press has treated the war as if it was the Simpson trial. Facts are not part of the equation and most of the pundits are idiots. Have you ever investigated the education and background of these people. They hold positions of influence because they helped elect a candidate or because of their charisma and demeanor. The most venal of all are the Rumsfelds. For those of you who have an Ivy education or a child at Harvard or Princeton, academia is filled with Rumsfelds. </p>

<p>You listen, he sounds impressive, his demeanor is impeccable, yet careful analysis reveals that much of what he says is contradictory or nonsense. How many politicians do you believe would resign their office in return for a lasting peace? This is non-partisan question.</p>

<p>We are now doing business in Vietnam, and China is presented in a favorable
light because of the amount of trade. Cuba and Venezuela are threats to
our security. New Orleans is in decay. </p>

<p>Students were in the forefront of ending the war in Vietnam. Today our children are for the most part disengaged, particularly if they are in college.
Our troops are brave souls who do not make policy, but pay dearly. </p>

<p>For all of our idealism in the 60’s, look at the world our children have inherited.
Just last week my 14 yo was asked to write about a living hero. It started with Barry Bonds and ended in frustration.</p>

<p>OK, Wiseguy, which of my 12 sports channels or my 6 cartoon channels am I supposed to give up for another news channel? :D</p>

<p>ABC’s early morning news is running the following story this morning: </p>

<p>“Al Jazeera in English – But Good Luck Finding It”</p>

<p>

</p>

<p><a href=“Al Jazeera in English -- But Good Luck Finding It - ABC News”>http://abcnews.go.com/WNT/International/story?id=2664644&page=1&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

<p>In Europe, Al Jazeera English is available free to air on Nilesat, Astra 1 and Hotbird. David Frost’s program “Frost Over the World” is very “highminded” indeed and featured an interview with Tony Blair - which was partially rebroadcast on CNN. Anyone remember David Frost’s venture into American news broadcasting with “TW3” (That Was The Week That Was)? Rhiz Kahn has a question and answer program similar to what he was doing on CNN. So far, news reporting on Al Jazeera English is very much like a cross between CNN, BBC World, and reminds me a great deal of the quality of NPR back in the 70s and early 80s.</p>

<p>Al Jazeera Net is not affiliated with the Al Jazeera News Channel</p>

<p>CitationX, So sorry but they are indeed affliated - many of the same producers who work on the Al Jazeera Arabic programs are also directly involved with the Al Jazeera English channel.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p><a href=“Breaking News, World News and Video from Al Jazeera”>Breaking News, World News and Video from Al Jazeera;

<p>Here is some more background information on Al Jazeera Intl. (Al Jazeera/English) from The Guardian:</p>

<p>

</p>

<p><a href=“Comment, opinion and discussion from the Guardian US | The Guardian”>Comment, opinion and discussion from the Guardian US | The Guardian;

<p>correction: meant to say al jazeera.com is not affilated with al jazeera news channel <a href=“http://www.aljazeera.com/[/url]”>http://www.aljazeera.com/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

<p>however please note the upcoming english versions will water down the propaganda slant</p>

<p>citationX, good point and extremely interesting given the OP topic. I wonder how many people confuse Aljazeera.com publishing with Al Jazeera.net Arabic and English news channels? The two have nothing in common except for the Arabic name Al Jazeera, (although the .com is usually written as one word while the .net is written as two). It is a common geographic term that signifies island according to most sources, including Wikipedia. </p>

<p>In any case, all the media attention of late has focused on Al Jazeera.net - both for the Arabic, and now English, language coverage of the global goings- on. With so many news options such as BBW world, CNN intl., Euronews, CNBC, network ABC and NBC news, as well as Fox News (which, in Europe, is no longer available free to air but only as part of pay tv package options), not to mention movies and cartoons, it will be interesting to watch if and how long it will take Al Jazeera intl./English to build up a strong market niche. At present, their basic slogan is “setting the global news agenda”, and from the look of it, they are going to give it a good run for the money.</p>

<p>The following article, “In English, Al-Jazeera broadcasts Third World suffering in high-definition color” is from the Associated Press:</p>

<p>

.</p>

<p><a href=“http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2006/11/15/africa/ME_GEN_Qatar_Al_Jazeera.php[/url]”>http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2006/11/15/africa/ME_GEN_Qatar_Al_Jazeera.php&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;