<p>I have been eating at the residential dining halls pretty much daily for more than a quarter. Yet I decided not to purchase a meal plan, and instead deposit money onto my BruinCard and swipe every time. My calculations seem to say that this is cheaper (everybody I talks to seems not to think so however). But then if this is true, why would anyone ever buy a non-resident meal plan?</p>
<p>For example, the [Non-Resident</a> Blue 14](<a href=“http://map.ais.ucla.edu/portal/site/UCLA/menuitem.789d0eb6c76e7ef0d66b02ddf848344a/?vgnextoid=4652064a9a7d1010VgnVCM1000008f8443a4RCRD]Non-Resident”>http://map.ais.ucla.edu/portal/site/UCLA/menuitem.789d0eb6c76e7ef0d66b02ddf848344a/?vgnextoid=4652064a9a7d1010VgnVCM1000008f8443a4RCRD) plan costs $1228 per quarter. A quarter is like 11 weeks. Assuming the 14 meals per week is 7 lunches and 7 dinners. [Lunches</a> and dinners](<a href=“http://map.ais.ucla.edu/portal/site/UCLA/menuitem.789d0eb6c76e7ef0d66b02ddf848344a/?vgnextoid=f90a900f74a8c110VgnVCM100000e1d76180RCRD]Lunches”>http://map.ais.ucla.edu/portal/site/UCLA/menuitem.789d0eb6c76e7ef0d66b02ddf848344a/?vgnextoid=f90a900f74a8c110VgnVCM100000e1d76180RCRD) cost $7 and $8.25, respectively. So if you paid for all the meals, it would only cost 11<em>(7</em>$7 + 7*$8.25) = $1174.25, which is less than the Blue 14 plan (not counting that you will sometimes want to eat out anyway, so would eat less than 14 meals per week), and is strictly more flexible.</p>
<p>Calculations for the other non-resident meal plans similarly show them to be seemingly more expensive than the sum of the cost of the meals. Am I missing something here?</p>