<p>So, I have a great variety of undergraduate experiences. I am an Aerospace Engineering junior (and a liberal arts honors major, to boot). I’ve interned in aerospace industry-related jobs at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory and the Applied Physics Laboratory. But, my only publication credit is in biology (in BMC Genomics). And, I’m interested in studying aeronautics at Caltech, a pretty theoretical department, and my only aerospace undergraduate research so far has been applied stuff through student competitions. Now I have the opportunity to get involved in research with an aerospace prof, but it’s planetary science work!</p>
<p>Anyway, I feel like I can’t really rationally explain my shotgun approach to my undergraduate experience. I explore what I find interesting at any given moment, and that’s why I want to become a professor…</p>
<p>I guess my question is whether my inability to cohesively narrate my undergraduate experience will have a big effect on my grad school prospects. I’ve read somewhere that it’s really important for at least the national fellowship competitions to have a nice, coherent story behind your education.</p>
<p>On the plus side, in case you’re wondering, for the time being I have a 4.0, and I’ll probably do okay on the GRE.</p>