<p>I have already had Math 800 physics800 Chem 800
Then is it good to take anther one or two if I can definetely score a 770+</p>
<p>I don’t think it’ll really matter; colleges take top 2 or 3. I only took 4 because Chinese w/ Listening (even though I did get 800) hardly counts for anything as I’m part-Chinese.</p>
<p>Same case with davidyko, I did four 800s in total as I took Chinese w/ Listening. I’ve had a lot of discussion with other people about this, and the general consensus is that an extra SAT (if you’ve already got several 800s) CAN be helpful, but rarely is. If you can get another 770+ in history/literature without any time for revision, then do it. But don’t waste time on it.</p>
<p>^Instead of revision, I think you mean review. Sorry to nitpick, but maybe you didn’t know haha :P</p>
<p>What’s wrong with “revision”? That’s what we call it back in Europe :P</p>
<p>From Merriam-Webster on the definition of “revise”:</p>
<p>
</revise></p>
<p>whoa now, people.
I had the same question.</p>
<p>Thanks for you advice.</p>
<p>HIGHreachNoob: The British prefer “revision” over “review”, I believe, and I come from Hong Kong.</p>
<p>^^^
True. Oxford says:
<a href=“BrE”>quote</a> the process of learning work for an exam: Have you started your revision yet?
[/quote]
</p>
<p>^in french, we also say revision. only it’s pronounced “reveezeeon.”</p>
<p>but as to the OP’s question, i think 3 800’s are enough.</p>