Ok…I finished the book. I am going to share a few thoughts. . Share my opinions and I have opinions about the stories in the book. So…if you don’t want to read my opinions, I would skip the rest of this post. 
Ok…I am going go scramble a few letters so this post can be easily skipped.
Xcvnhvgycfuycghljhvfxhjgbjkvgfuchnkvjghblhjcghvljkjfyckhjbkghbilnjk
Vmghcgvvjgycgfjxhgfvhjlbjkvgfjvljhbjk.jbhlvgcjfcfjcfcgvhbjbjnjnknknknib.

I keep reading that victims of sexual assault should go to the police. What really happens when a victim goes to the police? How many rapists are arrested? How many are convicted?
I read that sometimes victims don’t want to go to the police and that’s true…
But what happens when victims do go to the police?
The book is a little disturbing. One thing I found interesting was sometimes the University of Montana did a better job than the police or the district attorney’s office. Did better in gathering evidence. Chapter 8 for example.
Many times, the police don’t believe the victims. Then …when the police do believe the victims…the prosecuters don’t want to prosecute.
In this town, we have women who go to the police… And about 10 percent of the cases are pursued…
This is how it is at Florida State too. I am pretty sure this is how it is all over the place.
We had a prosecuter who bragged about her conviction rates…but she turned down 90 percent of the cases
It 's true…we don’t really get her side in the book…but the math is there. 
Anyway, if people are going to suggest victims should go to the police, shouldn’t that be a viable option that actually works for a victim?
So much depends on who the police are and who the prosecuters are and who the judge is. You get the wrong person dealing with your case…and you are done.
If fewer than 3 percent of rapists are convicted, is going to the police a good solution for victims?
One of the cases in the book, the guy confessed, and the victim still went through hell during the legal proceedings.
Does the adversarial legal system really discover the truth? When lawyers are deliberating distorting facts and concentrating on irelevant issues to manipulate a jury, do we really get just verdicts?
This guys lies. That guy lies. And we end up with the truth. I don’t remember that formula when I took a logic class back in the 1980’s. 
I read that the victim reported the case a year to the police a year after it happened so the case should not be taken seriously. There are some explanations. A victim decides she doesn’t want to prosecute, but then something triggers her memory, her fears, her anxiety…
Something like running into the assaulter months later can trigger very strong feelings and cause the victim to change her mind about pursuing a case legally. Being taunted by an accuser and his friends…reading or being told lies…can cause a victim to change her mind about pursuing a case. Concern for future victims can cause a victim to change her mind about a case.
I like the book.
We have a long way to go with how we deal with sexual assault in this country…and there isn’t an easy solution.