<p>Is narrow good or is broader better? Narrow seems logical for those applying to very specific programs… but I’m afraid my interests have been all over the place. </p>
<p>That being said, will having all sorts of experiences be detrimental to my application? Because personally, I think having a wide range of interests can be very beneficial.</p>
<p>I’ve done work as a tutor for the college, a college newspaper editor-in-chief, a part time clerical job for the advising department… (all paid by the school, clerical job being work study, and the other two were not.) P.S. this might sound really stupid, but I did the tutoring and the newspaper at the same time, does that count as one year or two years :X.</p>
<p>Outside of the school arena, I’ve done work in private news corporations, as a copy editor, an embedded reporter for a month, and then later on as an intern coordinator. (it’s fun bossing other kids around, and getting paid to do it is DOUBLELY so.)</p>
<p>As for unpaid work, I did an internship for one semester for the college media advisers thingy.</p>
<p>I just graduated this spring, and one of my professors hooked me up with a colleague of his that is “emertius” but still publishing. So now I’m his research slave for this entire year till I get into school next fall (hopefully) + I get to have my name in the publication/as well as getting paid. </p>
<p>After having said all this I guess I’ve had narrow experience in media publishing… but I’m interested in Polsci/IR. The professor I’m working with now is specialized in international law, so I hope that’s relevant to the field. I also graduated with a government degree as well.</p>
<p>What I’m saying is, almost none of my ‘work experience’ has nothing to do with political science, that would probably hurt me right? :(</p>