I’ve tried twice to ask this on the regular board, and both time the thread was hijacked by people debating the validity of the question and any answers that are given. If you feel that this is a dumb poster asking a dumb question, great. I’m dumb. Feel free to PM me to tell me that. But please just skip over the thread and don’t take it over with a debate about the validity of the question.
S is trying to get a handle on the comparative workload at elite universities. He gets that they are all difficult, and that attending one while competing in athletics makes it doubly difficult. Having said that, he’s trying to find out the difference between the workload at various schools.
He is a math guy, probably will major in math or econ, possibly a hard science. He would much rather take any math or science class over a class with a writing requirement, so in that sense Brown or another school with a more open curriculum may be a bit easier just for his strength set.
Obviously this is just one of many factors. But generally speaking, which of the elite schools are going to be a more manageable work load for an athlete? He’s a pretty social kid, and a bit freaked out by the possibility of nothing but studying and practicing for 4 years. He’s looking at the Ivy’s and other comparable schools, probably D1, although I am also curious how the top NESCAC schools would fit in.
I don’t really care about grade inflation, UNLESS that means that everyone just works a bit less hard. If Brown students don’t put in as much time as Princeton students because they know that A will come easier or at worst the gentleman’s B, that I care about. Basically how much time comparatively is required to look like an acceptable student when it comes time to apply for a job.
Thanks.