Would you rather be incapable of work or incapable of relaxation?

<p>(title) .</p>

<p>I'm practically incapable of work, and although it's stressful when I do have to do work, it's a lot better than working all the time...</p>


<p>Both are really terrible...so I can't choose one and give a good basis for my reasoning, without sounding moronic, so I suppose I'll just pick relaxation....but then I would also change my persona I suppose....in to a chill type of person...</p>

<p>i am incapable of work.</p>

Me too!
I thought I was the only one! :)</p>

<p>I would rather work all of the time. people who work all the time can accomplish things. people who never work are basically just stoners who watch TV all day and leech off of society.</p>

<p>incapable of work. People who can't relax are never happy</p>


<p>I am incapable of relaxation. I'm so busy, it sucks.</p>

<p>incapable of relaxation</p>

<p>Why would you ever willingly be unable to relax. You'd have to kill yourself eventually. If you can't work hard you'll be a poor, worthless schmuck, but at least you won't be worrying about it.</p>

<p>I would rather be incapable of relaxation. Of course, that's assuming I get the job I want in the relatively far away future (I want to be a professor, do research, teach the odd class in Math and/or Physics). I would probably not even notice that I'm not relaxing, cause I would be having too much fun (maybe FUN isn't the right word, but I know what I mean :P).</p>

<p>Incapable of answering this ridiculous question.</p>

<p>I don't think this question is ridiculous at all.</p>

<p>Many years from now after you've worked yourself into the ground by doing a job that pays a lot of money... will your monetary riches be worth all the fun times that you missed out on?</p>

<p>Work is reallllly vague. But there really is not a choice if you are anything but an uber crazy capitalist</p>