<p>13)
Charles Dickens’ Great expectations is a nobel [in which] the main character becomes so [obsessed with] the idea [of becoming] a gentleman [that] his moral judgment is temporarily affected. No error.</p>
<p>Can you guys tell me which grammar concept is this question testing ?</p>
<p>Passage reading
</p>
<p>Which is the best replacement for “ran into” in sentence 3 ?</p>
<p>1) encountered
2) met up with
3)observed
4) confronted
5) got hold of</p>
<p>I made the answer “got hold of”,but the correct answer is “observed”.</p>
<p>32) Of the following which is the best revision for the underlined part of sentence 5?</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>1)trade, not to mention on
2)trade, but also
3)trade, an impact also on
4)trade; it also was affecting
5)trade, and they also affected</p>
<p>The answer is A,but I really don’t get the logic behind this answer shouldn’t it be “trade, and they also affected”?</p>
<p>Isn’t it correct as is? I don’t see anything wrong… except for the typo you made… (nobel –> novel)</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Perhaps I’m having a bad day, but the answer seems like 1. encountered. Can you double check that? I don’t think any other choices make sense besides “got hold of” (maybe).</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>“They” cannot refer to anything. 5 would have been correct if the pronoun “it” were used.</p>
<p>The answer in 13 is D I don’t understand why “that” here would be wrong.</p>
<p>I doubled checked question 31 and the correct answer is encountered, but got hold of makes sense to me more. Why would we choose here encountered instead of get hold of?</p>
<p>“That” is crucial for the so…that structure…</p>
<p>For 31, the term “run into” is commonly used to mean “to meet by chance” or “encounter”. “got hold of” means “obtained”. E would only make sense if you did not know the phrase “run into”.</p>